Hello guys,
We’re somewhat struggling with moving traditional file shares to SharePoint Online. Unanimously people recommend moving to multiple sites vs a single one because the ease of management. While I do not doubt that I simply cannot see the logic. The only real limitation I can think of is the amount of items per site where moving to multiple sites would make a difference.
What is easier about managing permissions on for example 5 folders in the root of a single site vs managing the permissions on 5 separate sites?
What I do know is that it is way easier to have my user go to a single site to find their stuff vs 5 different sites (and their corresponding URL’s) or am I missing something here?
What’s wrong with traditional file shares?
SharePoint is best for Office docs. It’s not great for anything else, especially binary files, or files that link to other files. And you’ll probably run into file lock issues if they’re edited by multiple people.
If there’s a clear delineation you can use for separate sites, use it. For a ~40 person business we just had one site. For a ~4000 person business we had one for each business unit. It’s just an additional layer. Quantity of files and folders could be a factor, depending on how much you will be using it.
Also, if you’re in any kind of regulated industry, keep that in mind.