Such a weird and morally loaded article.
It seems to conflate a bunch of choking techniques, only mentioned once with jargon, but keeps talking about breath play only?
Conclusion calls it “not normal” but half of people do it?
Outcomes like Russian roulette? One in six die? Ok?
It’s both obviously
The wild thing is, NFTs were creating value before they were called that, and they still are. A git commit hash is an NFT, for all intents and purposes. The only uhh innovation is being able to pay money for it.
“I like it in here.”
Only the cone-magnet-coil-wires part is the same. All the electrical parts are different. There’s no way.
Right wing’s dream. Immigration restrictions, cannon fodder, and when the war is over, the ones with PTSD can be used for propaganda about how violent they are.
How is this calculated? Wouldn’t people vote differently in a different system? What system does the UK have now that allows this calculation?
Lower temperature is not necessarily better quality. At 0 it will get very repetitive, it’s for classification tasks, not for prose.
I suppose the optimal temperature depends on the model and the task, and I don’t think it’s very sensitive. Varying temp might even give better results, who knows.
By being just a little weird, but in a pattern, and not to you. A pattern like: every n tokens raise the temperature (randomness) for one token. Then to dectect AI, you tokenize and calculate how expected each next token is. Then you try fitting the pattern to that.
Is it webscrapers?
Except they’re he censorship party, not their opponents, so the only way this could be true is if they stop posting content. Utopia
deleted by creator
Supposedly the people paid to rate responses are already using AI
The message is clear without knowing the reference though
I don’t know whether I agree with all of these, but the list is probably longer and there will be many good ideas. That doesn’t mean total nonprivacy is possible, or a good idea.
The best ideas in your list are probably more about transparency in low-trust environments, rather than personal privacy.
Yeah but we’re talking about your idea now.
We don’t need to reach utopia, but the supposed benefits of total nonprivacy only come when it’s total. Then it’ll never happen, as long as someone benefits from hiding.
Econ 101 is about the benefits af free market. All the classes after are about why it can’t be achieved and how to deal with that.
That’s not an ideology, that’s a dream. It’s trivially true, but it doesn’t apply to the real world. Nothing you do can bring reality closer to that, and you’ll just open yourself to harm.
LLM is fine to say, not more awkward than element. And it is AI.
And I wish we’d call phones computers. It’s been very profitable for corps for people to not realize that they are.
And abstinence is the least effective birth control, but proper education saves lives. Wished this article took the same approach!