• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    The real reason for lack of interest is streaming quality of 4k has been getting worse for years, and is still like 1/10th the quality of 4k BluRay, with enormous levels of compression and artifacts.

    8k requires 4x the data. We all know that means every subscription would charge at least 2x more to maintain profit margins of unlimited growth for vulture capitalism, and they’d skimp on the extra data too; leaving users with nothing better than the current 4k.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s true, and to add to that, most mobile phone and many land Internet based connections are not unlimited and have caps. Nobody wants to stream a few 8k movies and use up their entire monthly cap in one shot.

      -speaking as a US user, many countries offer unlimited as standard but not the evil empire.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, storage/bandwidth is the overall limiting factor regardless for 8k. Also, most peoples xp with 4k is streaming, so there would likely be 100x more of a market for increasing bitrate from the current “compressed as all fuck” up to 4k Bluray bitrate, before anyone cares about 8k… but of course, that isn’t something that TV manufacturers can control or use to sell more products.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If your phone is 1080p you won’t be being served 8K video on any streaming service. 8K phone screens aren’t coming any time soon, as even 4K is overkill and rarely done - and even then, netflix etc still don’t stream 4K to them.