I am seeing a growing discussion on the need for more Linux phones in the market given Google’s problematic behaviour w.r.t the changes that will be introduced to that OS.

One very good point that some community member raised was that Android itself wasn’t the problem but the locking of the bootloader in the phone. If the bootloader could be unlocked, then it significantly lowers the bar for the end user to install their OS of choice.

I have dabbled with flashing OSs in old smartphones (GrapheneOS, Post market and Lineage). I commend the developers because I could do that without truly having to “understand the code” at the lower levels. But I assume that was possible because the boot loader could be unlocked somehow*. It seems that isn’t the case with many/most phone fro. Samsung / Xiomi, etc.

Are their bootloaders truly unlockable? Is it simply impossible to unlock and relock bootloaders?

  • I know that with lineage, the bootloader couldn’t be relocked and that was touted as a security flaw. If someone could explain why this lock/unlock is so complex, I’d appreciate it.
    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like this would be counterproductive in that it would ultimately be turned against the hacker group and used as fuel to increase control of devices when said group bricks 500,000+ phones or whatever. At least in the us the media and government will always side with corporations and that takes a huge amount of the population along with them

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Android is probably one of the most secure systems out there

      Good luck although I don’t condone cybercrime as it primary harms innocent bystanders