• bergetfew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Even if we get people to shift to privacy respecting or encrypted apps, the problem still stands. They could just ask you to give access to those services. If you don’t, it would come with its own legal challenges.

      Section 247(1)(ii)–(iii) mandates individuals and businesses to disclose passwords or encryption keys and permits officers to “override the access control” of any device or account. If you don’t hand over your phone passcode or email password on demand, officials can hack into the device. Any refusal is now explicitly punishable as non-compliance.

      End-to-end encrypted messaging services like WhatsApp or Signal could be forced open during a tax raid.

      Solving the issue would need to come from challenging the act itself.

      • Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If you scroll down the article you would see that the select committee is shutting down any requests for change with the same set of arguments. The recourse might be to challenge the act in court but that seems unlikely, The public wont really do anything about it, because in their view it doesn’t affect them; they fail to see(and are veiled from seeing) the highly probable misuse angle of such far reaching legislation.

        Bottom line: As long as you don’t touch the street dogs you can get away with anything