korendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoPixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square173fedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down135
arrow-up1601arrow-down1imagePixelfed user count has gone vertical.lemmy.worldkorendian@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square173fedilink
minus-squareSabin10@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·edit-24 months agoIsn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong? Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-24 months agoYou are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis. (… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoOne percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.
Isn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong?
Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.
You are mathing wrong. The GP is correct, except for the fact that it applies to the Y axis.
(… it’s a much smaller change on the X axis anyway, something with 10 zeros before the first non-zero digit…)
Its ~12%
One percent of 300,000 would be 3,000.