A video essay on what we give up in exchange for the convenience that social media and algorithms provide.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is true of the overwhelming majority of YouTube videos I see submitted here. The information density is just abysmal compared to a page of text.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that is why I don’t click on or watch YouTube videos from here. Either I’ve seen the video already (as is the case with a lot of gamers nexxus vids), or I am not willing to give the amount of time it takes to watch the video when I could read a distilled version of it in a minute or so. I don’t care about your greeting (hey, this is [channel] here, back with another video. Today we’ll be talking about [insert topic], but first …[mindless garbage]).

      I know that newer gems love video format and want it for all the things but I do not.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Well, there’s certainly that. But even then, I’d think that a lot of videos could be made to be more concise. I was actually wondering whether YouTube creators get paid based on the amount of time they have people watch, since that’d explain drawing things out. My impression, from what I could dig up in a brief skim, is that they’re indirectly linked — apparently, YouTube shows ads periodically, and the more ads shown, the more revenue the creator gets. So there would be some level of incentive to stretch videos out.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There absolutely is and there has been for a long time. But YouTube cracks down on that as well by watch %. So you have to keep them engaged as well.