• NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    218
    ·
    2 days ago

    https://keepandroidopen.org/

    Google says “power users” can “still install” unverified apps. Here’s what that actually looks like:

    Delve into System Settings, find About Phone

    Tap the build number seven times to enable Developer Mode

    Dismiss scare screens about coercion

    Enter your PIN

    Restart the device

    Wait 24 hours

    Come back, dismiss more scare screens

    Pick “allow temporarily” (7 days) or “allow indefinitely”

    Confirm, again, that you understand “the risks”

    Nine steps. A mandatory 24-hour cooling-off period. For installing software on a device you own.

    Worse: this flow runs entirely through Google Play Services, not the Android OS. Google can change it, tighten it, or kill it at any time, with no OS update required and no consent needed.

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Worse - that 24 hour timer? You only have a short window of time once it finishes to continue, otherwise you have to wait another 24 hours.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Under the assumption this is a non negotiable thing…

        They should at least let you alter the timer if you know you might not be able to

        Like if in the post 24h window you know you’ll be busy, let you make it 28h instead of 24h

    • rotten@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The same procedure applies if you want to unlock the bootloader?

      Edit: OK nvm it must be done to unlock the developer’s option

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      It won’t be a problem on a de-googled phone. Get it running LineageOS or GrapheneOS. Then install F-Droid (and probably Aurora store too). Some Google junk won’t work, but you’ll soon be more limited by having Google services on your phone than not having it.

      • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hardly the point though. For us this is a bother at most, but we can cope because we’re already doing our own thing and know what we want. Imagine trying to get your non tech-savvy friends to “sideload” (install) an app from outside the Play Store. Right now it’s not a big deal, so if they’re interested in the app, they’ll likely install it. But this amount of friction and scary warnings is way more likely to stop them.

      • devfuuu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        If one looks at the supported devices pages (which I do regularly hoping that it supports mine) it’s easy to see that 99% of devices on the market simply can’t use them.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, it’s been getting harder as time goes on. It’s basically only pixels that are supported and still on the shelf.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Non-tech savvy people don’t even care, don’t even think about this, and don’t know anything about it.

        • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No, some of they do care, but just have problems learning tech stuff or were excluded from digital education at the critical age, or have in general learning difficulties.

          My mom wants to still be able to install and uninstall anything she wants on her phone, but she’s elder (and is neurodivergent, too, as me) and has difficulties understanding and learning about tech stuff.

          You’re making a hasty generalization based on just a composition fallacy (some non tech savvy people don’t care at all, yes, but those are not all of the non tech savvy people).

          You shouldn’t be conflating both things as if it were the same, and even if they were the same (which they’re NOT), that wouldn’t make your comment less bad. They’re still victims of the Big Tech propaganda and marketing and of their massive social, cultural and political influence campaigns.

          Please, don’t be such a dickhead.

          • titanicx@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Show me one non-tech savvy person that is installing anything that isn’t in the Android Play Store already. And that person has to have come up with this on their own and it wasn’t somebody like you who maybe tech savvy showing them how to do this I’ve been in IT for 21 years and I can guarantee no one is doing that.

            • amplifiedrabbit@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              A non tech-savvy person may not be aware of the extent of digital surveillance and the rights they give up on their data unless someone who is aware tells them about it.

              Even after becoming aware - the inconvenience of switching to something else forces them to stay in that ecosystem unless someone helps them out of it. Many of them care enough to want to stop or limit their exposure to big tech, but without someone tech savvy to help they won’t know where to start.

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              And that person has to have come up with this on their own

              Why is this a requirement?

              Plenty of people who would use privacy-respecting, free software that a tech-savvy friend likes and uses will now have to go through this process and probably decide it isn’t worth it.

    • tixnou@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      i hadnt thought about it before but i just had the realization that im not even gonna be able to have 3rd party apps AND my banking app in the same phone (cuz it doesnt like developer options being enabled). uhm shit

      • cotlovan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I unlocked my phone’s bootloader. I’m on the oem OS, up to date, no root, just unlocked the bootloader. Now my device is “not certified” and a lot of apps that have no business caring about my “certification status” don’t work (like my phone operator app). That’s if the playstore lets me download it in the first place: “this app is not compatible with your device”

      • notthebees@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Latest Android update will hide developer options supposedly from apps. However, it’s on Android 17

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is why rooting is great and if you re worried about banking apps, KernelSU is very good at blocking detection and keyboxs for the hardware attestation get leaked weekly.

    • polle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I recently learned that this setting actually persist after migrating to another phone.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Which is perfect for them to keep tying your profile information across the board in yet another way. Fuck that.

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Do you create a new Google account every time you change phones? They’re already tying everything to you

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have 1 Google account use specifically for spammy shit. That account is tied to a completely fictional person and lives inside 1 chromium browser.

              My phones and computers have never seen a Google account other than inside the VM that runs that browser.