• YashaB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Makes you think that a technology that is 30 years old hasn’t been put in service once…

    But this is beside the point. Public transport is about a fast, reliable and comfortable option for the daily commute, to replace cars. Not about making long-range options an hour faster…

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It has been in service for 20 years but only on a single short line. it is clear that the technology is more expensive than the HSR in Germany that is at 300 km/h or below, and then DB is an absolute mess nowadays anyway, incapable or incompetent of building the regular rail projects it is even contractually obliged to.

      Your definition of public transport is very strange. Rail, including Maglev, can serve different purposes. Inter-city connections are one of those. I know it is a fairly foreign concept to many Americans even though you can find those things at least in some corners of the country. If it is one hour faster, this enables corridors that were not feasible before. It is the question if the costs still make sense but we can’t know until we see an actual line being built. China appears to still believe that the technology makes sense, otherwise they’d have not invested into more R&D based on the Transrapid technology. We’ll see if they will make something out of it. Germany is probably not large enough to actually have any national need for a system as fast as +400 km/h. China being considerably larger might be a different story.