Five years of your social media just to visit the US on an ESTA, and 50,922 phone searches at the border in a single year with no suspicion needed. Part 1 of my Five Eyes series: who else gets to see it?

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fishface, I linked you to a particular part of the article. Did you miss it by mistake?

    Here is the part you failed to read:

    The Panopticon […] must be understood as a generalizable model of functioning ; a way of defining power relations in terms of the everyday life of men. No doubt Bentham presents it as a particular institution, closed in upon itself. […] But the Panopticon must not be understood as a dream building

    If you are able to scroll down even further and continue reading, you’ll also discover workplace surveillance is considered a Panopticon… Even though it apparently fits into your definition of something that is “circumventable”, wherever you pulled that from.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I read that quote from a person other than the originator of the idea, yes. It is espousing that metaphorical application of the panopticon. It doesn’t have anything to say about the applicability of the metaphor to searches in an airport.

      I don’t think we’re making any progress here, so see ya.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        other than the originator of the idea

        The word does not belong to the person who “originated” (labeled) it. I’m sorry you don’t like the modern usage and have chosen to die on that hill, but the rest of us are here on the internet, not in the 19th century.

        I’m sorry you refuse to make progress.