Republicans come in three types. Those motivated by crazy neoliberal ideology based on the sociopathic views of Ayn Rand (“The virtue of selfishness”) Hayek and Friedman. Both social Darwinists who thought that the markets should decide everything. Xenophobic, usually homophobic, and some overtly racist. Some just want to enrich themselves at the expense of others, seek attention, and thirdly,a hate fuelled repugnant mixture of both. Inept, ignorant, incompetent, stupid, perverted, or deranged.
As someone who’s been following US politics from the outside for about 20 years now, it’s actually very onbrand for them. This is just Vietnam all over again, another ill thought out conflict, inflicted on the population without a vote without discussion, with the expectation that the population will just go along with it, and the oppression of any voices against it (including other politicians in their own party).
The only differences is the thin veneer of validity has gone. They’re not even pretending that they’re fighting the good fight anymore. This time they are the oppressors, they’ve gone full mask off.
Yep. All of this. In just about every conversation about conservatives, it seems someone raises the spectre of what conservatism is really supposed to be about.
I’m not sure it’s all that useful to really delineate between what conservatives do and this theoretical version of conservative that largely seems to live in the minds of people like David Brooks.
Even in one of the most canonical examples of the “true” conservative - William F. Buckley, the conservative’s conservative - we quickly see how that kind of thing is deflated - he’s often thrown out there as some kind of standard-bearer who “stood up” to things like the Birchers (but then still had backchannels to them). He not only hurled a gay slur, but threatened physical violence on the air. And the book that put him on the map is the same kind of whining invective we see today from the right about how the universities are indoctrinating the children. And he wrote it 75 years ago.
“I used to wonder how it was possible that Trump could have won in 2016 and then again in 2024, given how emotionally toxic, morally vacant, and psychologically mangled he is.
I do not wonder anymore.
He won for that exact reason.
He was not a candidate. He was a mirror.
If you were a racist, you found your guy.
If you were a misogynist, you found your guy.
If money was your only religion, you found your guy.
If your heart was armoured shut, you found your guy.
If you mocked disabled people, you found your guy.
If you hated intelligent people, you found your guy.
If you were a rapist, you found your guy.
If you enjoyed golden showers with Russian sex workers, you found your guy.
If you had done absolutely nothing to confront your emotional wreckage, you found your guy.
If you were a serial cheater, you found your guy.
If you were a perpetual bankrupt, you found your guy.
If you stiffed honest workers, you found your guy.
If you were a conman, you found your guy.
If you mocked people’s appearances, you found your guy.
If you longed for a toxic Daddy, you found your guy.
If you were dissociated and disembodied, you found your guy.
If you were unconscionable in every economic dealing, you found your guy.
If you lied as naturally as breathing, you found your guy.
If you had never eaten a green vegetable, you found your guy.
If you were a white supremacist, you found your guy.
If your ego contained a hole so large not even the presidency could fill it, you found your guy.
If you were a sociopath who cared not one molecule about other humans, you found your guy.
If he had only two of these traits, he never would have won. He won because he had hundreds of them, and millions of people recognized themselves in at least one.
This has never been about Trump. It has always been about the people who finally had their worst instincts validated.
Trump did not create the cruelty, he licensed it. He handed out permission slips for hate.
He is merely a symptom of a far deeper disease: collective toxicity.
If there is one sentence that explains Trump’s power, it is this: “He says the things I’m thinking.”
That is the part that should chill the spine.
Who knew that tens of millions of Americans were thinking such unconscionable things about their fellow citizens? Who knew how many white men felt so threatened by women and challenged by minorities that they were ready to torch democracy to feel big again? Who knew that after decades of apparent progress on race and gender, so many people were living in seething resentment, waiting for a demagogue to legitimize their worst selves and convert their bitterness into political power?
We were living in a fool’s paradise.
We aren’t anymore."
— Michael Jochum
Conservatism is a mental disorder.
Republicans come in three types. Those motivated by crazy neoliberal ideology based on the sociopathic views of Ayn Rand (“The virtue of selfishness”) Hayek and Friedman. Both social Darwinists who thought that the markets should decide everything. Xenophobic, usually homophobic, and some overtly racist. Some just want to enrich themselves at the expense of others, seek attention, and thirdly,a hate fuelled repugnant mixture of both. Inept, ignorant, incompetent, stupid, perverted, or deranged.
This neo tech fascism has little in common with conservatism, other than conservatives who can’t differentiate of course.
As someone who’s been following US politics from the outside for about 20 years now, it’s actually very onbrand for them. This is just Vietnam all over again, another ill thought out conflict, inflicted on the population without a vote without discussion, with the expectation that the population will just go along with it, and the oppression of any voices against it (including other politicians in their own party).
The only differences is the thin veneer of validity has gone. They’re not even pretending that they’re fighting the good fight anymore. This time they are the oppressors, they’ve gone full mask off.
Yep. All of this. In just about every conversation about conservatives, it seems someone raises the spectre of what conservatism is really supposed to be about.
I’m not sure it’s all that useful to really delineate between what conservatives do and this theoretical version of conservative that largely seems to live in the minds of people like David Brooks.
Even in one of the most canonical examples of the “true” conservative - William F. Buckley, the conservative’s conservative - we quickly see how that kind of thing is deflated - he’s often thrown out there as some kind of standard-bearer who “stood up” to things like the Birchers (but then still had backchannels to them). He not only hurled a gay slur, but threatened physical violence on the air. And the book that put him on the map is the same kind of whining invective we see today from the right about how the universities are indoctrinating the children. And he wrote it 75 years ago.
“I used to wonder how it was possible that Trump could have won in 2016 and then again in 2024, given how emotionally toxic, morally vacant, and psychologically mangled he is. I do not wonder anymore. He won for that exact reason. He was not a candidate. He was a mirror. If you were a racist, you found your guy. If you were a misogynist, you found your guy. If money was your only religion, you found your guy. If your heart was armoured shut, you found your guy. If you mocked disabled people, you found your guy. If you hated intelligent people, you found your guy. If you were a rapist, you found your guy. If you enjoyed golden showers with Russian sex workers, you found your guy. If you had done absolutely nothing to confront your emotional wreckage, you found your guy. If you were a serial cheater, you found your guy. If you were a perpetual bankrupt, you found your guy. If you stiffed honest workers, you found your guy. If you were a conman, you found your guy. If you mocked people’s appearances, you found your guy. If you longed for a toxic Daddy, you found your guy. If you were dissociated and disembodied, you found your guy. If you were unconscionable in every economic dealing, you found your guy. If you lied as naturally as breathing, you found your guy. If you had never eaten a green vegetable, you found your guy. If you were a white supremacist, you found your guy. If your ego contained a hole so large not even the presidency could fill it, you found your guy. If you were a sociopath who cared not one molecule about other humans, you found your guy. If he had only two of these traits, he never would have won. He won because he had hundreds of them, and millions of people recognized themselves in at least one. This has never been about Trump. It has always been about the people who finally had their worst instincts validated. Trump did not create the cruelty, he licensed it. He handed out permission slips for hate. He is merely a symptom of a far deeper disease: collective toxicity. If there is one sentence that explains Trump’s power, it is this: “He says the things I’m thinking.” That is the part that should chill the spine. Who knew that tens of millions of Americans were thinking such unconscionable things about their fellow citizens? Who knew how many white men felt so threatened by women and challenged by minorities that they were ready to torch democracy to feel big again? Who knew that after decades of apparent progress on race and gender, so many people were living in seething resentment, waiting for a demagogue to legitimize their worst selves and convert their bitterness into political power? We were living in a fool’s paradise. We aren’t anymore." — Michael Jochum