• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    ā€œWestern orderā€ to me means Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, East Timor, Iraq, Afghanistan, colonialism, the silent holocaust (the one in guatemala), Guantanamo bay, Pinochet, the genocide in Palestine, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, Iran, etc. The author mentions ā€œwestern orderā€ as though it’s a good thing. It’s not. Not saying we should all ally with Putin, but I really don’t consider what we, the west, have done to the world a good thing.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      That’s what bothers me about people calling him a ā€˜traitor’. A traitor to what? Global US imperialism? Massacres of school children, bombing weddings, hospitals? Long before Trump the US has been a murderous racist thug stalking the earth like a demon.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        2 hours ago

        Not a lot of people learn that kind of history. I’m meeting gen z kids who barely know Iraq even happened. One million dead, based on a lie, and it takes one generation to completely forget it.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    3 hours ago

    That’s because orange donny wants to be emperor of the western hemisphere while pootin wants to be emperor of the eastern hemisphere.

    Did anyone think donny and pootin were no longer friends? After pootin put donny in the white house twice and is working on his third term now?

    Seriously?

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          They may disagree with the idea of it but the reality is that China has full power to dominate their sphere of influence if they choose and no other single nation has the means to stop them.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    4 hours ago

    Traitor Trump doesn’t speak for the American people anymore than Putin the Poisoner speaks for the Russians. Put them both in a room and let everyone they have wronged have a go at them for all I care. They are just puppets for the wealthy.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    Ā·
    6 hours ago

    The so called American experiment is over. The result proved to be no different. The nature of humanity is perpetually fighting for freedoms.

    Their superpower was not their military or their economy. It was the mythology that they were exceptional people and the modern exemplar of democracy. For a while much of the world was to believing too.

    Canada’s PM Carney said it well. The world put up with them out of convenience.

    The Americans took that tolerance as a compliment on their brash attitude. They couldn’t adapt when reality diverged from the mythology. Half of them are coping by following the traitor into oblivion. Half of them are insistent reality will return to their mythological storyline.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      It was over when it started. The founding fucks idea of liberty was simply those with the money make the rules and don’t have to follow them. The so called American experiment has been a great success for the wealthy. You are just confused by propaganda that it was ever about anything else.

      The real news is the rot that exists in the US exists in every country. You can point, cry, rage, etc all you want about the US but it is coming to your country unless you have policies in place to reverse the wealth gap.

    • aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

      for the lazy

  • sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    Ā·
    15 hours ago

    America isn’t like this because Trump is president

    Trump is president because America is like this

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    Ā·
    17 hours ago

    America is most certainly NOT an ally of Russia. Only that traitorous coward and his administration is.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          Ā·
          3 hours ago

          I, unfortunately, live in a red state. I am surrounded by conservatives. I grew up in the Seattle area so I know you are correct, but it doesn’t feel that way where I live.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        2 hours ago

        I didn’t vote for, nor do I support trump. Therefore. Your ā€œfactsā€ are already wrong as ALL of America is only represented by the entirely of it. And while I live here, I am represented.

        And in the event that my omission alone is not enough of an example for you to understand that some ≠ all, by my math, roughly 272,358,341 people of the 349,660,921 citizens in this county didn’t vote for him either.

        So maybe you should start the process of changing your ā€œfactsā€ to fit reality.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        Ā·
        16 hours ago

        He’s the leader of MAGA. He doesn’t represent America. This is a very important and distinct difference that one who is capable of nuanced thought would easily understand.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          Ā·
          16 hours ago

          LOL anyone capable of nuanced thought would absolutely understand that the President of The United States of America 100% represents America.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            Ā·
            14 hours ago

            Except that not only is that the antithesis of how a federal system works but do you really think that all the tribes support this just as one for instance? Being a tribal member I can just tell you that we don’t and he has been trying to undo our citizenship since day one because of it. What about all the places in the US that can’t vote for the president? I’m not totally sure you understand what the word nuanced actually means.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              Ā·
              11 hours ago

              that not only is that the antithesis of how a federal system works

              What in the world are you talking about? Every leader of every region in the world represents their people, regardless of what any of those people think of them. That’s why they’re called ā€œrepresentativesā€. That’s exactly how that works.

              President Xi doesn’t come to the US and meet with Barack Obama, because he doesn’t represent America, and can’t make decisions for them.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                Ā·
                4 hours ago

                What in the world are you talking about? You seem to be completely forgetting how many times state governors meet with world leaders just like the leader of Germany would.

                Would you say that Gavin Newsom doesn’t represent California because Trump exists?

                The federal system is literally designed such that the head of the EU isn’t the only person representing interests in the EU and the US is exactly the same way. To say that Trump represents the whole of the US is a childish oversimplification at best.

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  Ā·
                  3 hours ago

                  You seem to be completely forgetting how many times state governors meet with world leaders

                  Remind me, which state is Obama the governor of?

                  Would you say that Gavin Newsom doesn’t represent California because Trump exists?

                  …huh? Newsom represents the state of California. Trump represents the country of America.

                  To say that Trump represents the whole of the US is a childish oversimplification at best.

                  To say that he doesn’t is just extremely ignorant. I don’t even know how to go about explaining this. He’s the President of the USA. It’s literally the only thing he does is represent America.

          • Pratai@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            Ā·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            So you think that every German in the 1930-1940’s were racist Jew-hating jack-booted authoritarians?

            Clearly, you are not one of those people that are capable of nuanced thought. Therefore, IMHO, I think you’re probably going to be useless to any discussion I might find myself in. So…. Blocked.

            Learn how to be a better person. Like me, the rest of the world won’t wait for you.

            • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              Ā·
              9 hours ago

              This is so pathetic.

              Someone tells you a hard truth and you just block them.

              I’m sorry to tell you that you’re going to need to block pretty much anyone who is not American, or a Russian bot, because anyone paying attention agrees with the guy you just blocked.

              • Pratai@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                Ā·
                2 hours ago

                look at where we are. Do you think I expect people to agree with me?

                I’m not here to argue color with the colorblind. I’m just staring reality. You know, that thing that is too often suspend to support the hive here??

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              31
              Ā·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              So you think that every German in the 1930-1940’s were racist Jew-hating jack-booted authoritarians?

              Of course not, but if you answered on your history test that Hitler didn’t represent Germany, you would flunk. These are not the same thing. Clearly you are not one of those people capable of nuanced thought. Learn how to be a more educated person.

            • sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              Ā·
              16 hours ago

              Did the ones that weren’t matter? Did they keep the war from happening or keep millions from being killed in camps? So yeah, he doesn’t represent me or my beliefs, but he sure as shit has been able to order the deaths and deportations of thousands. To deny that influence because not everyone in the u.s. agrees is just silly.

                • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  Ā·
                  9 hours ago

                  What are you, as a nation, going to do about the lunacy of your leader?

                  The last decade has demonstrated that your entire nation is incapable of doing anything at all, to your great shame.

                  The stench of your inaction will linger across the globe for decades.

                • danekrae@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  Ā·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  "We are only hundreds of millions of people here! What could we possibly do?!

                  ā€œWe tried nothing and are all out of ideas.ā€

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            Ā·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Oh only smooth brain Dems and memory holed liberals would take that for sarcasm.

            It was a subject of intense debate during the Obama administration, and like every thing this current administration takes for granted in their authoritarian sweep, the basic infrastructure for those actions was installed by under Democratic administrations, or at least neoliberal/ administrations.

            This was the debate we were having, and liberals of the time were largely fine with the role of the presidency, because it was there team in charge. I strongly recommend this old episode because exactly this problem was being discussed almost 15 years ago. And if you don’t have a problem with it when it’s a Democrat doing it, you don’t have a problem with it.

            Intelligence Squared debate: ## Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?

            Even if you disagree and you think Trump is a mushroom that popped out of the soil in the night, you should watch or listen to the above debate.

      • D_C@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        Ā·
        12 hours ago

        Twice. Fucking TWICE!

        And since the first time that bag of rancid gonorrhoea was elected there’s been:
        An insurrection.
        A bunch of court cases that ended with convicted felonies.
        A successful rape trial, and payout.
        A raid because a lorry load of top secret documents were stolen… AND then stored in an unlocked room next to a fax machine. A FUCKING FAX MACHINE.
        A blatant attempt to flood a server area which held the CCTV footage.
        A confession about showing said documents to a journalist (I think), plus other people.

        And those are just the bullet points I can quickly think of of easily proven corruption and illegality. But there’s more. So much more.
        So, yeah, if a country elects a disgusting thing like that again and again then I’m believing it’s what they want.

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        12 hours ago

        ā€˜It’s the systems fault, not mine! I had no reasonable choice! Damn them all! I’m the victim here!’ - sitouts justifying their role in 2024

        Smfh

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    What an article.

    Consider what the American president just told the entire world: Please don’t interfere in my relationship with a murderous dictator, or he might help the country that America’s men and women in uniform are fighting at this very moment. The leader of the most powerful nation on the planet—yes, that’s still the United States right now—is trying to get everyone else, including the American Congress, to avoid antagonizing Putin, instead of warning Putin not to even think about aiding Iran.

    As always, The Atlantic’s solution to every situation is to be more aggressive and militaristic. A more sane version of this article would be criticizing Trump for starting the war in Iran to begin with. But The Atlantic jizzes their pants over the war because they’d been dreaming about it for ages.

    The author seems to be struggling here with the concept that Superman does not exist. The US, like any country, has a limited ability to throw it’s weight around. This is exactly why sanctions on Russia didn’t work and were never going to work, because they just sold their oil through India and China, and China was never going to cooperate on sanctions while we were antagonizing them in a pointless trade war. ā€œFull aggression on every front,ā€ the dream of every Atlantic writer, only has the effect of spreading the US thin and weakening its ability to apply real pressure anywhere.

    The irony here is that Trump is overextending the US and trying to be in too many places at once, by starting the Iran War. Most ordinary people, including many on the right, oppose the war for that reason. But The Atlantic is so committed to full aggression everywhere that they somehow find a way to argue Trump isn’t overextending enough. And, naturally, their objection seems to primarily be that it’s undignified to acknowledge these limitations, rather than framing things around any actual human cost.

    A world in which the White House is allied to the Kremlin was, until now, the stuff of paranoid fiction. Manchurian candidates and red presidents were fantasies, dark tales that Americans told themselves, like ghost stories around a campfire. But this alliance now exists. If Stalin and his Cold War successors could see what Trump and Putin have created, and how the mighty United States has been humbled and humiliated, they might think that their evil hopes were not wrong, but only that they dreamed them too early.

    This whole framing of it being an ā€œallianceā€ because the US stopped sanctioning them is patently absurd. Is the US ā€œalliedā€ with every country it’s not currently sanctioning? Words mean things.

    But what’s especially ironic about this part is that the USSR, under Stalin, was literally part of ā€œThe Allies,ā€ during WWII. The US traded with the Soviets, fought on the same side against a common enemy, sent them military aid, coordinated on military strategy, etc. Why would Stalin consider it particularly remarkable, even if the US had entered an actual alliance with the Russian Federation? That’s also completely dismissing the whole history of the collapse of the USSR and the US involvement in establishing the Russian Federation in the first place. It’s just stupid.

    By the way, why did the US ally with Stalin? Was it because FDR secretly agreed with him, ideologically? Or was it because the US was aware of it’s material limitations and made the correct decision to focus on one problem at a time, instead of maximum aggression towards everyone at once? If this guy had been in charge back then, we’d all be speaking German.

    Even after WWII, throughout the Cold War, the US traded with the USSR. The US also signed treaties and agreements such as SALT. And whenever it did, there were plenty of these insane, warmongering reactionaries, like the author, who pushed the exact same kinds of exaggerated rhetoric about how the politicians responsible were being controlled or manipulated by the Kremlin. These extremist nutjobs want the same thing they always have, a future where when the dust settles there’s two Americans left and one Russian, so they can call it a ā€œvictory.ā€

    he may well believe that some janky diesel deal with Russia will alleviate high fuel prices in the United States. (It will not, although it will certainly help some Russian companies.)

    Honestly I just love this line, the cherry on top of the whole piece. ā€œIt will not,ā€ zero elaboration whatsoever. Reminds me of this classic Onion article. Why would making oil more directly accessible, instead of shipping it to China or India first, not lower fuel prices? Even if there’s some reason why it wouldn’t, why isn’t it included in the article? It’s just unprofessional.

    It seems that the author included that line because he’s concerned that people will care more about fuel prices than the rest of his arguments, and he’s concerned such people might agree with Trump. But how on earth do you paint yourself into such a corner, in your own article, that you’re left baselessly asserting, ā€œit won’t,ā€ regarding Trump and fuel prices? Donald Trump is solely, directly responsible for prices soaring, on account of his pointless, failed war of aggression against Iran.

    But again, no one at The Atlantic wants to frame things in those terms, because they just love war so damn much.

  • šŸŒž Alexander Daychilde šŸŒž@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    Ā·
    17 hours ago

    Republicans have been favoring Russia for well over a decade and more like 15 years at this point. That’s another line Democrats really haven’t crossed.

    It’s not an American thing, it’s a Republican thing, and Republicans are not America, although they represent around half.

    That said, Russia is fighting Cold War II and we’re not even aware, so they are wildly winning. Much moreso than in Ukraine, an actual ā€œhotā€ war.

    • ContactClosure@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      10 hours ago

      Did you forget when they all had Ukraine signs and stickers? Right up until he said one good thing about Putin then bam supporting Ukraine is woke.

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Conservatives see the current liberal democratic world order and think it’s a degenerate failure of civilization. Many reasons for this but it can be summed up as ā€œracism and culture war bullshit.ā€

      They will literally side with Russia to destroy it if they are given an opportunity.

      Edit: It is my uneducated prediction that we will provide to Russia: military intelligence within the next few months, raw materials and/or dual-use tech in Q1-Q2 2027, and major weapons systems by the end of 2027.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        16 hours ago

        Oh I totally believe we already are and have been for quite some time.