So I was toying around with the idea of what it would take to go full Snowdon mode. I starting looking around for info online about how to de-bank yourself and unfortunately non of what I found was useful. One comment on a related reddit post literally said you should just get over your irrational fear of banks, which I get what he means from a great depression standpoint but that’s still incredibly unhelpful. Other resources pretty much all said it’s too inconvenient, too expensive (because a lot of services you would use might charge fees), and not worth the effort. Most of the discussion around this topic though was focused on normie reasons like not trusting them with your money or whatever, but not much discussion was related to how banks participate in the ever expanding data market. I figured it would be more helpful to ask this wonderful community of like minded privacy enjoyers.

A bit of context on the scope of the question:

  • I love monero and would use it for most of my online purchases where applicable, but I don’t want to store my money in crypto unless I can be 100% sure it’s a reliable stable coin, and I don’t trust the current state of crypto to be capable of that so a different way of storing money would make more sense (the obvious answer being cash in a safe like the good ol’ days).
  • I’m sure this community would take this as a given, but I’m not looking to move from a bank to another service that requires a similar level of PII, like cash app. Only based anonymous methods allowed
  • However I don’t necessarily mean untraceable. I’m not looking to start beef with the IRS, I just don’t want my financial info in the data market
    • sleepundertheleaves@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I was just reminded that keeping cash in a safe is a bad idea in an inflationary economy, and the economy is getting awfully inflationary these last few years.

      If you want to invest in something that appreciates in value, and can be bought and sold for cash, precious metals are the gold standard (sorry). But there are also luxury collectibles like super high end watches, handbags, and wine, and not so luxury collectibles like [insert fad here].

      These markets do take some expertise to invest in if you don’t want to lose your shirt. There’s a lot of scams, exploitation, and just plain bad deals in the precious metals market - for example, don’t buy gold from any company with the word “patriot” in the name - and I don’t know much about the collectible market except it takes even more expertise to make good investments and you’re even more likely to lose your money when a salesman talks you into a collectible that loses 99% of its value in the first year.

      And criminals and money launderers are also fond of these investments for obvious reasons, so DYOR 😆

      • flaccid_corn_husk@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, someone else mentioned that gold was better for physical savings as well. I’ll definitely keep that in mind.

        I think it’s so interesting to see how we can live without the overbearing industries that seem to be facts of life. It’s so easy to forget that the people of the past that didn’t have these systems were able to get by just fine, and they were just as capable as we are now. They didn’t have special advantages that allowed them to live their ways of life, in many ways they had less advantages, but humans are incredible creatures and we don’t need an abundance of simplicity and convenience in order to exist. Often times those systems of convenience just end up becoming systems of control.