cyrano@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoA cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inmantheoatmeal.comexternal-linkmessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up1555
arrow-up1555external-linkA cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inmantheoatmeal.comcyrano@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square115linkfedilink
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoOption 2 is soulless. Option 3. Destroy the capitalists owned robots and bring the robots under the control of the working class.
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoOption 3 still ends up with robots and no-one doing the jobs that the robots replaced.
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoOption 3 would be a weird way of communism. Which still enforces my point. The reason why you fear for job safety is not the fault of technology.
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoOption 3 is also what the historical Luddites wanted. They liked technology when it benefitted them, not when it was used to exploit them.
Option 2 is soulless.
Option 3. Destroy the capitalists owned robots and bring the robots under the control of the working class.
Option 3 still ends up with robots and no-one doing the jobs that the robots replaced.
Robots aren’t the problem.
Option 3 would be a weird way of communism. Which still enforces my point. The reason why you fear for job safety is not the fault of technology.
Option 3 is also what the historical Luddites wanted. They liked technology when it benefitted them, not when it was used to exploit them.