Hey dude, I was responding to your incredibly shitty examples. You give me no information and blame for not having information well, that’s a you problem. But I suppose if you understood that concept you’d also understand the problems I’m talking about.
Now, again, if the AI can have access to all that information and identify it correctly then why is it impossible to do what I’m asking? It has to be able to tell the difference somehow, right? And with LLMs being known to have hallucinations and serious misunderstandings it seems rather ridiculous to rely on it for something that you say is so complex that a person cannot do it. You also haven’t answered me, I don’t think, on the topic of what people were doing before the LLM.
There are a lot of key elements you’re dodging here and before you start talking shit maybe start addressing them.
My example was perfect, but you got yourself twisted up in knots trying to pretend that firstly you understand what these AI tools can do, and secondly that what I made it do is something that is easy for all users to do as quickly as the AI agent can do it. It shows a complete lack of understanding of the entire concept of AI agents and their abilities and reasons for existing. Now you’re just digging in your heels and digging yourself further into the hole because you don’t want to admit that there are massive use cases for LLMs/AI.
The AI has access to all of the database structure, including primary and foreign keys. It doesn’t hallucinate when you’re getting it to tell you about a set of data like that. With these agents you also can give them a massive ever evolving prompt to “train” it on what to do and what not to do, and how to interpret things.
It’s clear as day that you have literally zero experience in the field, so quit while you’re behind.
“My example was perfect” then why was it so pathetically simple? You’re trying to show how AI will solve complex issues and you present something that a toddler could sort through. Maybe your database is just organized like dogshit or maybe you have a point but lack any kind of communication skills to the point where you don’t understand that I don’t know the specifics of how your company works/struggles to function.
And for the love of god can you put even the slightest fraction of the effort you’re putting into being an asshole to answer my questions that I’ve asked repeatedly?! How were people handling this data since before your little LLM tool?
Hey dude, I was responding to your incredibly shitty examples. You give me no information and blame for not having information well, that’s a you problem. But I suppose if you understood that concept you’d also understand the problems I’m talking about.
Now, again, if the AI can have access to all that information and identify it correctly then why is it impossible to do what I’m asking? It has to be able to tell the difference somehow, right? And with LLMs being known to have hallucinations and serious misunderstandings it seems rather ridiculous to rely on it for something that you say is so complex that a person cannot do it. You also haven’t answered me, I don’t think, on the topic of what people were doing before the LLM.
There are a lot of key elements you’re dodging here and before you start talking shit maybe start addressing them.
My example was perfect, but you got yourself twisted up in knots trying to pretend that firstly you understand what these AI tools can do, and secondly that what I made it do is something that is easy for all users to do as quickly as the AI agent can do it. It shows a complete lack of understanding of the entire concept of AI agents and their abilities and reasons for existing. Now you’re just digging in your heels and digging yourself further into the hole because you don’t want to admit that there are massive use cases for LLMs/AI.
The AI has access to all of the database structure, including primary and foreign keys. It doesn’t hallucinate when you’re getting it to tell you about a set of data like that. With these agents you also can give them a massive ever evolving prompt to “train” it on what to do and what not to do, and how to interpret things.
It’s clear as day that you have literally zero experience in the field, so quit while you’re behind.
“My example was perfect” then why was it so pathetically simple? You’re trying to show how AI will solve complex issues and you present something that a toddler could sort through. Maybe your database is just organized like dogshit or maybe you have a point but lack any kind of communication skills to the point where you don’t understand that I don’t know the specifics of how your company works/struggles to function.
And for the love of god can you put even the slightest fraction of the effort you’re putting into being an asshole to answer my questions that I’ve asked repeatedly?! How were people handling this data since before your little LLM tool?