iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 days agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square162linkfedilinkarrow-up1689
arrow-up1689imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 days agomessage-square162linkfedilink
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.