iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comimagemessage-square164linkfedilinkarrow-up1695
arrow-up1695imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...reddthat.comiamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square164linkfedilink
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.