- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
Why??
Something about child processes, maybe?
Forking children
It even has a redaction!
That’s hilarious. I’m guessing its a result of an auto-redacter which is set to redacts urls or something? since the original would be
--enable-largefile Enable support for large files (http://www.sas.com/standards/large_ file/x_open.20Mar96.html) if the operating system requires special compiler options to build programs which can access large files. This is enabled by default, if the operating system provides large file support.I can’t see any obvious keywords there, it would be very telling to be able to determine what theye filtering on, if we had enough unredacted/redacted pairs to find out
Large files huh? “Large” like “4k videos of blackmail material” large or what are we talking here?
Fedora just runs my large 4k videos of totally not pirated movies just fine, I’ve never had a file too large to access.
I like how it asks of you are 18 or older
It’ll have been an important question to Epstein, for very wrong reasons
Because legal discovery data retrieval is almost entirely automated. You are always going to end up with some irrelevant shit in there because it matched a keyword search somebody used for discovery.
Source: I used to do this when companies I worked for got subpoenas for email data.
Yup probably because “children” and/or “child” is referenced in there
Because child processing and sacrificing child are very epstein thing to do…






