Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

  • tortina_original@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.

    Probably never.

    • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

      "writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

      Learn to read.

      • atomicorange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.

        • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah, they’re just upset that I criticized their non-existent standards so they pretend that what I’m saying doesn’t make sense.

          I see it all the time.