Just a moment...
alternativeto.net
        • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.orgEnglish
          3·
          2 months ago

          If it is a studio recording of music with vocals since 1980-90, I would put money on there being some correction on the vocals. If it is a studio recording of music with vocals since 2000, i would put money on there being some use of autotune or melodyne or a similar pitch correction software/hardware.

    • Daredoedel@feddit.orgEnglish
      4·
      2 months ago

      I wish this fucking Cher Song would have never happend. I hate autotune with a passion, especially when it’s at 100% and sounds like a drunk robot.

        • Daredoedel@feddit.orgEnglish
          3·
          2 months ago

          Taste ist different for everyone, but: why have a singer if you fuck up his voice into something that is not recognisable as a human beeing anymore? Could just use a Keyboard with those effects.

        • Renohren@lemmy.todayEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          I wonder if there is a mix up in our minds between the use of auto-tune to “correct” a voice track and the voluntary use of extreme auto-tune options to create music out of an otherwise bland track (like daft-punk used to do…).

          I’m not a musical artist so I don’t know exactly how far auto-tune goes or if you can classify all voice mods as auto-tuning.

        • Dynamo Maus@feddit.orgEnglish
          1·
          2 months ago

          I did not downvote but actually do “like autotune”. It is a way to play with the voice in a way the voice never would or should. Why not?!