• deliriousdreams@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    You appear to have gone completely around the twist.

    You haven’t shown a logical progression of anything you claim. You don’t point to any current legal precedent, clearly aren’t paying attention to the actual wording being used to draft this bill/law proposal, and are spreading what amounts to FUD.

    About the only truthful logical statement you’ve made is that it’s not about whether you like or dislike these companies.

    Companies are considered a lawful entity with rights. The supreme Court literally just ruled that LLM’s do not count as the same kind of legal entity because if they did they’d be able to copyright their “work”. So I really do question how you think we go from that to “nobody has free speech because the LLM can’t give legal advice”.

    Speech that causes harm has pretty much never been a protected form of speech in the US, even if I were to humor you and assume that an LLM could have the rights to it.

    And you mean the “bad these companies have wrought”.