FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 15 days agoTruthpastelemmy.worldimagemessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up11.03Kfile-text
arrow-up11.03KimageTruthpastelemmy.worldFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square115linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·15 days agothis is a joke, right? how would anybody take that website seriously? it screams “hit back, never return, and forget I exist”
minus-squarepet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoWeird kneejerk. What specifically is wrong with their methods of research?
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoI’m not talking about their methods. I’m talking about the presentation.
minus-squarepet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoAh, indeed, that’s certainly the correct approach to any scientific info.
minus-squareratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 days ago“Is it in a serious, reliable publication” is indeed a good first question to ask yourself when trying to determine if something is scientific information or just some rando’s personal opinion.
minus-squarepet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoJust to check, you definitely use the same criterion when you read about a dude measuring stuff with a multimeter, right?
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agouh, yes? do you seriously think presentation is not a part of it?
minus-squarepet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoExplain to me how the presentation affects whether there’s lead in toothpaste.
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agooh, you’re just intentionally playing stupid. got it.
minus-squarepet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-214 days agoLooks more like you’re playing stupid, but you might simply be sincere, who knows.
this is a joke, right?
how would anybody take that website seriously? it screams “hit back, never return, and forget I exist”
Weird kneejerk. What specifically is wrong with their methods of research?
I’m not talking about their methods. I’m talking about the presentation.
Ah, indeed, that’s certainly the correct approach to any scientific info.
“Is it in a serious, reliable publication” is indeed a good first question to ask yourself when trying to determine if something is scientific information or just some rando’s personal opinion.
Just to check, you definitely use the same criterion when you read about a dude measuring stuff with a multimeter, right?
uh, yes? do you seriously think presentation is not a part of it?
Explain to me how the presentation affects whether there’s lead in toothpaste.
oh, you’re just intentionally playing stupid. got it.
Looks more like you’re playing stupid, but you might simply be sincere, who knows.