I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term “forced inclusion,” which I didn’t raise. You did. I can’t reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.
Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive.
I didn’t raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :)
“Nuh uh” isn’t an argument. If you won’t read the comment then I won’t be able to give you a meaningful reply.
Your examples provided made no mention of “forced inclusion” or what makes it different from regular inclusion.
I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term “forced inclusion,” which I didn’t raise. You did. I can’t reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.
…this you?
What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?
Yes, in response to this comment.
I didn’t raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :)
You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?