claim_arguably@lemdro.id to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoWhat's a scientific fact that sounds made up but is 100% real?message-squaremessage-square258linkfedilinkarrow-up1210
arrow-up1210message-squareWhat's a scientific fact that sounds made up but is 100% real?claim_arguably@lemdro.id to Ask Science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square258linkfedilink
minus-squareWigners_friend@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoBut it does mean the duality is not logically necessary.
minus-squarecockmushroom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoHonestly, I’d’ve thought it meant the exact opposite.
minus-squareWigners_friend@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoWell in de Broglie-Bohm you have a particle and a wave as separate but connected entities. That can’t be a duality (which requires two equally valid but mutually exclusive descriptions).
But it does mean the duality is not logically necessary.
Honestly, I’d’ve thought it meant the exact opposite.
Well in de Broglie-Bohm you have a particle and a wave as separate but connected entities. That can’t be a duality (which requires two equally valid but mutually exclusive descriptions).