For 11 weeks, I tracked all of my AI use. One hundred sessions. I counted the tokens processed and applied publicly available numbers on per-token energy and water intensity from Epoch AI and operator-reported data from Microsoft and Google. Anyone can run this math.
In those 11 weeks, I built an iOS app from scratch and wrote policy briefs on extreme heat for nonprofits I work with. I produced documentary pitch decks and drafted a 15,000-word climate fiction piece about the Colorado River collapse. I used AI every single day, often for hours at a time.
Total lifecycle water footprint of all that work: about five gallons. That accounts for everything: the water used to cool the data centers, the water consumed at power plants to generate the electricity, and the water embedded in manufacturing the hardware.
When an Outside editor reached out to ask me to write this story, I was on a trip to Marble Canyon, Arizona, to train raft guide companies on what is happening with the river. I drove my diesel Sprinter van from Tucson to the site, which tallied 383 miles at 20 miles per gallon of gasoline. When I ran the numbers later, the lifecycle water footprint of my fuel was around 110 gallons. One drive to the work I do on the Colorado River used more than 20 times the water of everything I did with AI in 11 weeks. That comparison stopped me cold—and I study this for a living.


To everyone hating - the point is that if you think water use from AI is bad, you should also be opposed to car use even more. Yall all got your dick measuring tapes out for this one as soon as they pointed out that something is worse than your favorite thing to hate on, huh?
Pavlovian
I doubt that’s the point, I’d assume that being anti-car is already a popular stance among the anti-AI crowd. It feels more like an attempt to use shitty math (conveniently ignoring the cost to train an LLM) to make LLMs appear like a non-issue.
They also didn’t count the water required to manufacture the car. You might argue that a strict usage analysis doesn’t cover full lifecycle, but clearly this wasn’t intended to be lifecycle analysis for either case, so it still compares meaningfully.
Bruh, look at the community you just posted in.
Bruh, I know
I… this is literally the Fuck Cars community. What makes you think folks here aren’t “opposed to car use” enough?
Right. Presumably this was posted in agreement and support of the car-hating sentiment
Porque no los dos?
Thats the point