Companies are still improving data required for robots to perform complex household tasks, some of which require embodied AI

  • FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    how are you getting from A to Z there?

    What reason would the governments have for mandating a fine for dirty homes, and further more why would the existence of a robot make this more likely?

    • Corvidae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m making what is called an analogy.

      What reason would the governments have …?

      The motive is money, but I didn’t say anything about governments, that was your interpretation, and I’ll admit it is a possibility. These robots are said to be AI, and I’d be very surprised if they don’t also have wireless communications of some kind, but to whom and whether those communications can be hacked are all unknowns.

      • FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        A fine put in place by who if not the government?

        The privacy concerns of such a machine are indeed valid and I see no reason for anyone to put one in their house.

        • Corvidae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In the case of trash collection, the fine has been put in place by the trash-collection corporations. How that specifically may analogize to household-chore robots: I’m not sure. There are possibilities, but picking one among many and saying it will certainly be that one seems likely to be like gambling. Perhaps the robotic company requires you to sign an end-user agreement with lots of fine-print legalese.