Starlink operator SpaceX is fighting Virginia’s plan to deploy fiber Internet service to residents, claiming that federal grant money should be given to Starlink instead. SpaceX is already in line to win over $3 million in grant money in the state but is seeking $60 million.

Starlink is poised to benefit from the Trump administration rewriting rules for the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grant program. While the Biden administration decided that states should prioritize fiber in order to build more future-proof networks, the Trump administration ordered states to revise their plans with a “tech-neutral approach” and lower the average cost of serving each location.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    “But I want a monopoly! I demand a monopoly! I’m not rich enough. I’m afraid I will run out of money and starve!” - The Goblin

    It seems like the best solution would be to confiscate Starlink and nationalize it. Same with Space X. We paid for all of it, it should be ours. He can still work there, but he’ll collect a government salary, and expect to answer to a boss. Or get fired. Either way, I don’t care.

    He can keep Tesla, that will be bankrupt in 2 years anyway.

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Starlink is literally his plan to rule the world. If you singularly control access to the internet for everyone, you’ve won the information war… against everyone. The good news is his Nazi addict ass will likely die young from a chest-cavity attack.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    they hate you. always remember. they hate your entire existence. they’d literally crush you in a hydraulic press if they could. giving you pain is the only way they feel a semblance of happiness.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I don’t think they hate us, it just that they love money more. They can, and do, inflict untold misery and suffering so long as there is money at the end of it.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        no. there’s no end to the amount of disdain they have for you. they’d do it for free too; they just don’t have to.

        • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          People who disagree with you are people who never spent time with the ultra rich. I’ve had the pleasure to hang in those circles and it was absolutely eye opening the complete disdain that social class has toward the working class. It’s so fucking crazy that one has to see it for themselves to truly appreciate the hate they have for everyone not in their economic circles.

          Preach on brother, but I also understand why the plebs don’t believe you

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is absolute insanity. To think that fiber and satellites are even on the same playing field is absolute brain damage.

    • TheTurner@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      We just got fiber 3 weeks ago. I pay for 600Mb/s and it is honestly the best internet I’ve had. I was afraid that we wouldn’t get it, but I was astonished when a salesman stopped by. I signed up that day. Lol

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yep, $400bn wasted on fiber “deployments” that never went anywhere while telcos pocketed the cash, and that was as of like a decade ago.

        • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          And across the pond the french government spent 20bn to have the government build out fiber and now basically everyone in france has super cheap fiber internet.

          Paying companies to do stuff that’s against their financial incentives doesn’t work.

    • bryndos@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      If you figure out the right protocol you could probably catapult a series of twisted pears from house to house.

      The way the internet is going, bashed and bruised fruit salad sounds preferable to the actual data anyway.

    • haych@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I’d rather Starlink just be independent from Musk. There are people who just can not get a good Internet connection and rely on it, and other Satellite Internet companies are awful.

      I hate Musk as much as the next person, but Starlink is brilliant and works well. If they got rid of Musk and stopped being dicks like they are with this, it’d be okay.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Id rather all this space trash burn up and we just spend the money on providing internet via land.

        • Kage520@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          It’s still a good thing for cell coverage in remote areas for hiking emergencies though. The few satellites that currently do that are stupidly annoying and expensive to use. You have to carry specialized equipment, and if you use Garmin, you pay a yearly fee for the privilege of signing up for the low tier plan, then a monthly fee for the service, and then pay by the text message after the first few. Starlink just added T-Mobile so if you have a newer phone and use T-Mobile you can skip all of that and message out in emergencies without all that nonsense. Hopefully more brands will be added soon, but I don’t know.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Life is not safe. Adventure even less so. The loss of the night sky and the risk of Kessler syndrome is not outweighed by a slight convenience allowing influencers to stream video and hit social media while pretending to get away from it all.

            • 5gruel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              What a weird hill to die on. Is it about letting people die or about influencers livestreaming?

              What about comms during catastrophies? Small villages or off-grid houses? Remote research installations?

              I swear, Lemmy is becoming more reactionary by the day.

              • SpecialSetOfSieves@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                There are several grave environmental and civil problems with Starlink and other proposed massive constellations:

                • The threat to the ozone layer (when these low-orbiting sats start re-entering en masse in the next few years, we’re going to have more aluminum in the upper atmosphere than ever before - a known problem)
                • Overcrowding of LEO - the choicest orbital space over this planet is finite. Satellites in low orbit have tremendous kinetic energy and do not (cannot) fly in formation, as they spread out vertically; not that Starlink is designed to. Kessler Syndrome catastrophe or not, the risk of collisions is increasing rapidly. As some researchers have put it, LEO is the “Wild West” right now, and it definitely needs to be regulated by international treaty.
                • Light and radio pollution - aside from exacerbating the accelerating ecological damage from light pollution, this extends even to orbiting assets like the Hubble Telescope, which is already seeing interference from Starlink sats. I don’t see why SpaceX or any corporation, let alone nation, deserves to monopolize any part of the global environment this way. Astronomy and upper atmosphere research don’t need to justify their existence, particularly not in this situation… and yes, stargazers on this planet deserve the right to a “clean” night sky.
                • Corporate squatting - Starlink is approaching the point of outnumbering all other extant satellites from all other nations, since the start of the space age, combined. Why do they get to crowd everyone else out?
                • Vulnerability to the space environment - when the Sun acts up, Starlink sats have been disabled before, and in numbers. This is a threat to satellites in general (obviously), many of which are not shielded properly, but launching bunches of these satellites at once increases the threat sharply. I’m sure you’d agree that orbital debris is not something we should take lightly.

                I could go on, but I trust you get the point. I don’t object to temporary small-scale deployments of satellite groups during catastrophes, but we simply don’t need the permanent deployment of tens of thousands of satellites that the US, Europe and China intend to launch for global internet coverage - that can be almost entirely achieved from the ground.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Capitalism breeds innovation and advancement, folks!

    Also didn’t Rupert Murdoch also stifle fiber adoption in Australia because better internet would cut into his TV and print empire there?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Why is it always this same recurring cast of 100 same rotating cunts over and over ? If we get rid of them, can we at least have fresh new cunts, this batch is extremely stale, LUIGI !!!

      🧱🧱👽                        🔫
      🧱🧱🧘                        🔫
      🧱🧱🦵🏼                        🔫
      
      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        I was reading a (non-fiction) book about Gallipoli, a battle that was fought in Turkey in 1915-16 during WWI. At one point, an Australian journalist by the name of “Keith Murdoch” shows up and starts contributing to the Allies’ failures and eventual withdrawal. And I was like “wait, is that?” and the answer was “yep”. Keith Murdoch was born in 1885 and was Rupert Murdoch’s (full name Keith Rupert Murdoch) father. Aside from helping to fuck up Gallipoli, Papa Murdoch led a smear campaign against Australia’s greatest WWI general (who just happened to be Jewish) and got him removed from command. The Murdoch name has been a stain on humanity for a long time.