AlSweigart@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThe Backlash Is So Strong That People With “Pervert Glasses” Are Afraid to Use Them in Publictech.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square428linkfedilinkarrow-up11.62Kcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.62Kexternal-linkThe Backlash Is So Strong That People With “Pervert Glasses” Are Afraid to Use Them in Publictech.yahoo.comAlSweigart@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square428linkfedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.world
minus-squareeicker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago a camera isn’t a problem in itself. 2. there are AI/AR glasses without cameras; personally I own a G1.
minus-squareRandelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoThat’s “guns don’t kill people” but for face cameras. And if the thing doesn’t have a camera, they’re not really perv glasses, so no issue. That’s “not all men” for perv glasses.
minus-squarececinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.comBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago‘Surveiller et punir’, just the whole thing.
That’s “guns don’t kill people” but for face cameras. And if the thing doesn’t have a camera, they’re not really perv glasses, so no issue. That’s “not all men” for perv glasses.
So cameras are guns now?
‘Surveiller et punir’, just the whole thing.