• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    12 days ago

    TLDW: American companies spend insane amounts of money and have no path towards profitability, and Chinese companies are spending a tiny fraction of that to deliver a product that’s mostly as good. On top of that, countries and companies are uncomfortable relying on closed models. So, Chinese providers offering open models at far lower rates mean they’re quickly taking over the market. And it turns out that simply having the best model isn’t really the most important thing. If a cheaper model can do the work then there’s no point paying order of magnitude for a more capable one.

      • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        And the video points out that the reason AI has trouble getting profitable is because it doesn’t just work like how tech “traditionally” works: software pretty much only has development costs, and after that copying and selling infinite copies of the product is pretty much free, where as AI not only has development costs, but it also costs a ton to provide outputs to the customers.

          • whatiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            No, now that “cognition” of a sort can be smeared on any task at the cost of electricity the future belongs to those who control the generation of electricity.

            Local models are much less efficient in terms of both power consumption and cost per token.

            I am currently running a local model. It’s not efficient.

            • tracyspcy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Concept of global knowledge available locally sounds plausible to me. I’m not expert in this topic though.