cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up17cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up17imageAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square11linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareblackn1ght@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThis isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
minus-squarecopd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agobesides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
minus-squarerooroo@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNaaah. Good programmers know how to use as any as any to make this work in typescript as well.
This isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
besides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
Naaah. Good programmers know how to use
as any as anyto make this work in typescript as well.