

“When asked if they will vote for the platform that most supports union, workers’ rights, which are human rights, only 30% said they would.” “They also said they “feel like” the party doesn’t pass laws from the platform federally, but realized some states have, and that federally need enough majority and for long enough to keep the legislation people want.”
Kidding, I made that up, but somehow that 70% this claims, does not translate to consistent election wins, and then rights for the majority of us are chipped away each time, life seems harder so people often double down on blaming minorities and make harsher laws. It’s a historical pattern you can learn about and see it repeating again, or how to avoid it would be fun!







The llms keep getting worse where they first answer with both-sides have merit and give pros and cons, but try to avoid ranking by score, how well each issue helps the majority live healthier lives, quality of life and such. It doesn’t want to show how much higher the Democratic platform scores on a comparison of top voter issues. It should impartially do the math, show areas for improvement, see how people in other countries do better with x, y and z issues, and polls show they would never give up the nice things, we all should have too.