- 6 Posts
- 6 Comments
Babalugats@feddit.ukOPto
Privacy@lemmy.world•‘Danger to Democracy’: 500+ Top Scientists Urge EU Governments to Reject ‘Technically Infeasible’ Chat ControlEnglish
2·1 month agoThere is also this from the EDRi - “Sign the petition of the Stop Scanning Me campaign and join thousands of people opposing the attack on our secure communication. As soon as our petition reaches a critical threshold, we will deliver it to decision lawmakers as we did in the past.”
Babalugats@feddit.ukto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Cirrus app dev informing the app will stop working on certified android devices in '26/'27
58·1 month agoAnd so it continues… Google trying to shoehorn themselves into a position of authority of the internet. Imagine they get as much sway as the banks now have? Private entities controlling the masses for massive profits. Fuck off Google.
Babalugats@feddit.ukto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Outcry over ExpressVPN ownership: What the Israeli connection means for user privacy
27·1 month agoHave a look at who owns the other big names (this article doesn’t include all VPNs under their umbrellas)
Search ‘ziff Davis Israel’
Search ‘Tesonet Israel’
https://vpnpro.com/blog/hidden-vpn-owners-unveiled-97-vpns-23-companies/
Babalugats@feddit.ukto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Chat Control: A Threat to Privacy that Does not Solve the Core IssueEnglish
5·2 months agoConsidering the largest paedophile rings that we hear about (eventually) all seem to have connections to politics and power, I would say that they have a lot to hide. Not even accounting for the one currently ongoing in the US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/14/green-party-germany-paedophiles-80s
https://observer.co.uk/news/international/article/n0607frenchschool
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/28/world/europe/france-literary-prizes-matzneff.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/nov/01/worlddispatch.rorycarroll
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Galván_scandal
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-10-21-mn-56209-story.html
There are undoubtedly tons more, pick a country.
Babalugats@feddit.ukto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Chat Control: A Threat to Privacy that Does not Solve the Core IssueEnglish
24·2 months agohttps://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/
It’s also worth pointing out that the politicians voting on this are also exempting themselves from being monitored. Their chats, emails, photos etc… will remain private and will not be scanned. Literally not holding themselves to the same level of accountability. This could get very dirty.




I wonder what their motivation is. Just a good old change of heart, giving everyone a 2nd chance or possibly something else?