I may be wrong here, but does it really make sense when you can’t actually prove the misuse did or did not happen? Say, you suspect phishing, then it’s a matter of inspecting a few next e-mails to/from non-proton users to decide if it’s likely happening. On the other hand, when the account is blocked, proton (as long as the claims about at-rest encryption are true) has no way of verifying the claim, since, as far as I’m aware, a user can’t provide them with what they’ve sent even if they wanted to.

Surely, you meant https://github.com/kieraneglin/pinchflat

WDYM “the 1st time”?

I’d rather push for js-free internet as opposed to the one with free js (:

Interesting, so it’s not only their recent-ish (either 12th or 13th gen and up, iirc) laptop CPUs that die under normal load.

Mostly because compilers do this kind of stuff if you optimize for space, iirc. Not that you should never do it or something, but it kinda looks like premature optimization to me.

I’d probably get my name changed even without my accounts getting blocked

Signal is the most user-friendly option so far, which is also expected, given it’s also one of the oldest one of those.

Simplex is also a good-ish option, but somewhat rough around the edges; the biggest benefit is, one doesn’t need a phone number or e-mail to start chatting.

Matrix is questionable: it’s quite feature-rich, but lacks solid android clients (IMO, fluffychat is among the best so far, yet when I last used it, it didn’t handle stickers/custom emojis all that well, for example); as for the desktop/web clients cinny is a godsend due to allowing importing/exporting encryption keys manually, which just works all the time.

I’d rather btdigg, tho

Pidof files aside, them implying they need to watch children watching porn is not much better.

Let’s fight ai with ai! As in, opencv-driven turrets :)