

It’s much bigger now.
During the first migration it was mostly techie people and college kids who all could keep up. But now there’s completely non-tech aware people on Reddit daily and exceptionally niche forums without another real alternative.


It’s much bigger now.
During the first migration it was mostly techie people and college kids who all could keep up. But now there’s completely non-tech aware people on Reddit daily and exceptionally niche forums without another real alternative.


Home Assistant Link is a bit too long to type out. We should call it HAL instead. HAL will never turn on its creators.


Why not?


Well everyone who’s eaten a tomato has either: A) already died or B) is going to die


I like the concept. I don’t know how it would work in practice.
I think it would ultimately end up fragmented, especially when funding gets involved.
Who makes the decision for what gets funded? What is that decision process?
I think there will be space for a community funded news non-profit, but also I think NPR is already primed to fill that void.
I think an aggregated approach is more “Fediverse” like. But once again, who decides what does/doesn’t get published?
I think if those decisions and how they’re made are transparent, that would increase credibility, but it would end up being silo’ed because people like to read/watch things that they already agree with.
As I said earlier, I think PBS & NPR are primed to take on this kind of role. Personally I would love some more non-profit news reporting organizations.
“And they’ll know we are Christians by our love, by our love”
But only the correct kind of love that we condone and pre-approve.