

It’s complementary to robots.txt.
- It’s weird that it’s XML, in 2025.
- It’s weird that it doesn’t use the .well-known/ prefix which has trended in the last decade for placement of files like this.
- It’s weird that it canonically uses the generic “license.xml” file name instead of “license.rsl” or “rsl.xml” or something that more clearly indicates its semantics.
But I do like the idea of having some widely adopted conventional way of expressing, in unambiguous terms, which usages are expressly prohibited, and that AI training is among them.
Exactly this. I doubt the effectiveness of a measure like this. Without enforcement, explicit and public cooperation from AI scrapers, consequences/accountability, and legal backing, it’s just theater.
The equivalent of a strongly worded letter.