

Another propagandised German.


Another propagandised German.


You are a brainwashed German. A German could deny Poland’s right to exist without getting charged with a crime. Why this double-standard for Israel, a state very openly committing genocide? The majority of the world is condemning the genocide and all you can talk about is limiting speech for what are practically splinter organisations of splinter organisations in terms of relevance. 🤦
ARE YOU KIDDING? STOCKINGS ARE FOR NERDS – ARCH USERS – AND ONE CERTAIN FALLEN ANGEL FROM HEAVEN. NEWPORTS AND SHITTY INSTANT COFFEE ARE THE GENTOO PREREQUISITES.
I CHANGED MY MIND THEY NEED TO DO LFS


Mid twenties here, same situation. My bank closed my accounts lol


This mindset isn’t really conducive to meeting your needs.


Marx and Engels predicted that economies would become dominated by rentiers


It’s essentially this “conundrum”:
Work somewhere for the next two years and be able to lead what would’ve been middle class life 20 years ago. But your actions will be destructive.
Or decline to do that and try to get by living a less comfortable life which destroys less in the end.
I think the choice is clear. Other people have loved and just because you don’t know them doesn’t mean it’s more “moral” to hurt them, which is what I am getting at when saying that one’s actions are harmful.


I don’t know. There’re limits to what can be considered an acceptable hustle imo. I get the whole American thing about not judging what someone works. but you gotta cut it at elbit systems or ICE.
This is true, it’s the need for consistency that drives up costs.
Photography is harder than most people think. You need to get to the places where you are doing your job, there is tons of communication involved, then there is editing and proper archival stuff you need to do, accounting is also completely different from that of an uber driver’s, and it’s not just the camera that costs more than 5K (looking at you BRIESE and any basic lens set – telephoto, normal, wide angle, zoom, low light will quickly exceed the 15K mark if you care about professional standards). It’s really a whole thing.


Yes, right on. You won’t stop them by voting.


No, even this is a very bad idea. Ideally, no books are destroyed. A close relative of mine works as an archivist. They have tons of examples of how digitising and then destroying can create extra burdens. The data on hard drives or flash devices is too fragile.


I know that in disciplines such as math there are very often have books with less than 50 copies in circulation. The LLM companies buy maybe 2 of a given book which are subsequently destroyed with no backup data. You’re now at 48 in circulation, that is a significant reduction. Rinse and repeat a couple of million times and this starts to have a major influence on knowledge.
What’s perverse about it is that the data from the books is stored extremely badly within the models. So not only are you destroying sources, you are also necessarily falsifying them.


Pretty sure information that is hard to come by on the internet includes rare books.


I wouldn’t deny the damage caused by chatbot use, nor would I deny there being a culture of yes-men. These things are symptoms though, not causes. The question I think is important is “why are people this way?” and I don’t believe it can really be sufficiently answered by considering individual psychology or looking at small scale workplace dynamics.
The US government, federal and local, is much better at unifying data streams at this point time than it ever was. Flock came to fill the hole. Of course you’re going to get yes-men when such a big opportunity presents itself.
Arms manufacturing is also deeply unpopular. Arms manufacturers know this. They still do what they are doing fully aware about every implication, no culture of yes men needed in my opinion.
OK, I don’t think he is a person.