Per its nature, tor is definitely going to create a lot of noise in your capture. Shut it down and try again, see if you still have so many connections.
It is highly unlikely that you have malware that you can’t see, so if you still see them after shutting down tor, use tools that tell you which app has established connections.
deleted by creator
You call that a criticism? It’s a first impression.
I am a dev as well, and to build a website you traditionally need a dev. Well, nowadays, you can build a website with a “no code” website builder. That’s the most common “no-code” use.
Not that it’s relevant to this conversation, but that doesn’t stop people from hiring me to build their website, because “no code” also means “limited customization” and/or “low quality”.
“Building something” and “Building something that traditionally requires dev work” are not the same thing.
The software you use always needed code to make, but it doesn’t aim to skip the “hire a dev” phase of your project. If it does, it is “no code”.
And for the sake of argument, let’s say that Blender doesn’t exist and no other software fulfilling the same purpose exists. Then you’d have to commission a dev (team) to create that software so that you can train people to create 3D models. But the dev building your 3D modeling software doesn’t typically have the skills to use the software afterwards, so it does not fit the “no-code” definition.
TL;DR: It is a “no-code” software when you can skip the “hire a dev” phase of your project and use said software instead.
No, it definitely does not cover almost all software. Most software does not aim to allow a random user to build something that usually requires a dev.
When you use an OS, you build nothing. When you use a browser, you build nothing. When you use a game, you build nothing. When you use a graphics editor, you build something, but it’s not something that a dev could do.
I could go on with a list of almost all software like this, but that’s not a good use of my time, and I hope it is not necessary.
“no-code” software is a very specific category of software that aims to enable users to build something that usually is built by a dev, without needing one.
And while “no-code” can be a weird name, it makes sense when you read the definition I just gave. Just like “serverless” does not mean there is no server involved (obviously), but simply means you don’t even need to think about the server part.
Yeah, considering it is not impossible to geoblock per instance, they could.
Not a single part of your answer is about how the brain works.
Concepts are not things in your brain.
Consciousness is a concept. It doesn’t exist in your brain.
Thinking is how a human uses their brain.
I’m asking about how the brain itself functions to intepret natural language.
That doesn’t answer the question you quoted.
Of course the “understanding” of an LLM is limited. Because the entire technology is new, and it’s far from being anywhere close to being able to understand to the level of a human.
But I disagree with your understanding of how an LLM works. At its lower level, it’s a bunch on connected artifical neurons, not that different from a human brain. Now please don’t read this as me saying it’s as good as a human brain. It’s definitely not, but its inner workings are not so far. As a matter of fact, there is active effort to make artificial neurons behave as close as possible to a human neuron.
If it was just statistics, it wouldn’t be so difficult to look at the trained model and identify what does what. But just like the human brain, it is incredidbly difficult to understand that. We just have a general idea.
So it does understand, to a limited extent. Just like a human, it won’t understand what it hasn’t been exposed to. And unlike a human, it is exposed to a very limited set of data.
You’re putting the difference between a human’s “understanding” and an LLM’s “understanding” in the meaning of the word “understanding”, which is just a shortcut to say that they can’t be compared. The actual difference is in the scope of understanding.
A lot of the efforts in the AI fields gravitate around imitating a human brain. Which makes sense, as it is the only thing we know that is capable of doing what we want an AI to do. LLMs are no different, but their scope is limited.
They are talking at a technical level only on one side of the comparison. It makes the entire discussion pointless. If you’re going to compare the understanding of a neural network and the understanding of a human brain, you have to go into depth on both sides.
Mysticism? Lmao. Where? Do you know what the word means?
You’re entering a more philosophical debate than a technical one, because for this point to make any sense, you’d have to define what “understanding” language means for a human in a level as low as what you’re describing for an LLM.
Can you affirm that what a human brain does to understand language is so different to what an LLM does?
I’m not saying an LLM is smart, but saying that it doesn’t understand, when having computers “understand” natural language is the core of NLP, is meh.
That is actually incorrect. It is also a language understanding tool. You don’t have an LLM without NLP. NLP includes processing and understanding natural language.
Haha. Ha.
Now, your friend with the birlliant idea doesn’t need you anymore and can ask a chatbot to make his brilliant app all by himself!
That is definitely a great benefit of vibe coding: it’s an idiot magnet and frees up our brainspace.
Same here. I obviously don’t remember everything because I rarely if ever have to use them, but at least when the time finally comes that I need “git bisect”, I’ll know that “git bisect” exists and I’ll be able to go straight to the manual page that documents it.
No one expects anyone to read the manual and remember it all… But you will naturally remember the big lines and be able to refer to the right place when you need something.
I am using KDE’s Plasma 6 as a DE with Wayland. The compositor (window managers are a Xorg thing) is KWin
The shortcuts I use are Meta+Up/Down/Left/Right. I can’t remember if they’re default or if I set them this way.
I prefer to switch down to the VD with the doc on fullscreen than noving my head to another monitor
When I discovered it can be arranged in a grid, it made VDs so much more useful.
Cause a line of the same amount of VDs (9)… Ugh, not fun haha
Even though you can map each to a shortcut, it’s still tougher to use than a grid with directional shortcuts!
I’ll add “how expensive” to the list. Sometimes you’ll have to burn through devices.