I agree with your position. It’s just funny that you (and me) think that’s not our business, but others would already shame the project for that. ;)

score 2 · canonical

You are, of course, allowed to use LLMs in a personal context however you see fit. For example, you may use LLMs for exploring the codebase, research, debugging and bouncing around your ideas.

It’s funny they say “of course” — because this statement is enough for the project to go on the open-slopware list as “condones LLM ingestion”.

score 1 · canonical

I kinda guessed that but when the article says it can create many vulnerabilities, an example would be good. And also maybe why a naive approach with custom escaping or length prefixes isn’t enough.

score 1 · canonical

I wish this spent more time explaining the security issue with concatenation.

score 1 · canonical