

This is a week-old repo with a 163,000-line initial commit, and the test repo that init was dumped in from is filled with hundreds of claude/codex co-author commits. Regardless of whether it’s to hide the ai co-authoring, it’s shady to obscure a repo’s initial work like that.
I could be wrong, of course, but this smells like yet another overambitious ai-slop project that’ll get abandoned in a month.









You’re interacting with a server managed by someone else - everything that flows through it is ultimately under their control, and you’re trusting them with it. They could log everything, or nothing. Even if storing passwords hashed is the default, an admin can replace any part of the code they want, so they could grab and store raw passwords if they really wanted to, or take over your account and impersonate you, or any number of other unlikely but possible things.
So use a unique password, and only provide data (your real source ip, your saved posts, views, votes, etc) that you trust the admins of your server with.