@ribby tutto rientrato

@maheperrette 💪😅

@informapirata @eventi

@Sicofante certamente, ma sono piuttosto certo che ci sia qualcuno che ha già iniziato a farlo o per motivi di studio o per autopromozione delle proprie istanze/account

@poliverso @lealternative

@Sicofante l’articolo lo dà per scontato, ma il problema si pone in tutta la sua importanza sul “lemmyverso”: Lemmy, Piefed, Mbin.

Non so se hai provato a iscriverti a feddit.it, l’istanza Lemmy che gestiamo insieme a @lealternative; volendo puoi anche aprire la pagina in visualizzazione anonima feddit.it/?dataType=Post&listi… e se clicchi sul link vedrai la visualizzazione filtrata in cui i post vengono ordinati per popolarità.

Questa è una delle modalità preferite dagli utenti Lemmy.

Su Mastodon il discorso non vale se non per chi guarda le tendenze, ma su Mastodon sono i RT che possono alterare la visualizzazione quantitativa nelle timeline.

@poliverso

@elettrona sono sicuro anch’io che questa sia la risposta giusta. Come ho scritto altrove

mi sembra una strategia adeguata. Infatti chi ha un account social quasi sicuramente ha anche un account WhatsApp e quindi quello è il modo più facile per creare un gruppo. Non puoi chiedere a persone di questo genere di aprire un gruppo Matrix o xmpp…

@max verissimo, ma gli zuckiali non solo riprendono senza preavviso e senza consenso, ma inviano le immagini a spasso nel cloud per l’addestramento automatico e chissà cos’altro.
Come le Tesla, per altro…

@devol @emanuelegori

@ilsimoneviaggiatore

non è necessariamente un male ma lo è se vogliamo che il fenomeno esca dalla nicchia

il problema è che se il fenomeno resta in una nicchia, diventerà via via sempre meno sostenibile

@elettrona tieni sempre conto del fatto che si tratta di una app appena rilasciata

@melroy Unfortunately, as I explained elsewhere, the problem is that Meta has now “infected” the word thread.
For this reason I would propose #topicverse also because in fact, it is not so much the “thread” that characterizes the Lemmy/xBin/Piefed/BBCode environment, but the ability to immediately identify the “topics”. In fact, Mastodon also has the thread, even if it is unwatchable, but the topic display is only available in some software (and some apps like Raccoon for Friendica, which allow you to view the topics of activitypub groups also on Mastodon)

@OpenStars

@teirdes Thank you, even if it would take a specific commitment in each Nation, explaining well, based on the characteristics of the national publishing industry, What could be the strengths of opening your publishing to the Fediverse.
Of course one of the critical points that I see is that of advertising collection and fundraising in general.
Publishing and monetization in fact go hand in hand, with the additional variable due to the fact that many online newspapers are actually fictitious and designed only to publish garbage pre-digested by artificial intelligence. In this scenario, real journalism finds itself facing new critical issues and unfair competition. Asking publishers to enter the Fediverse without solving this problem is very difficult

@teirdes I had the presumption to identify some journalists who I thought were more sensitive to the issue of decentralization and the independence of their digital presence. I limited myself to those. Many of them didn’t even answer me, while others told me that they would have preferred to register in an international instance, demonstrating that they had understood absolutely nothing about decentralization. And in fact their profiles have stopped being active for a couple of years now… 😅

Now for a while I’ve been dealing more with the consolidation of the instance rather than with new entries, but I will surely soon start doing a bit of a broad-spectrum campaign again, as you suggested and as I should have done from the beginning

@teirdes I’m sorry but this is a totally fallacious reasoning that can be forgiven to an uninformed user, but it is not acceptable on the part of a journalist.

First of all, there are many instances dedicated to journalism, but each of them has particularities: instances based on the verification of the journalist, others pertaining to a particular linguistic area, others still linked to a specific political area. For example, we created an Italian Mastodon instance for journalists and academics and we accompanied it with a special version of Mastodon that allows you to create long and formatted texts. Well, it was of no use: academics are ten times more than journalists!.

Beyond these instances, there are others of a generalist nature, multilingual or localized in the national language.

Finally, there is always the possibility of creating your own instance: a personal instance of the individual journalist or an instance of the organization to which it belongs (publisher, newspaper, cooperative, collective). Without excluding the possibility of federating your Wordpress blog (a very simple action: all you need is a free plugin) or creating a newsletter on Ghost.

As you can see, no journalist would be forced to embrace an instance.

The problem is mainly attributable to journalists:

1. their laziness
2. their ignorance of the Fediverse (which was initially sold as an alternative to Twitter, but IT HAS NEVER BEEN AND CANNOT BECOME SO
3. the subjection that journalists suffer from fashions (Bluesky and Threads)

On our part, on the part of us activists of the Fediverse, there is obviously some blame, including that of having presented the Fediverse as something difficult to explain and not as something easy to use.

@macfranc @saskia Unfortunately, my impression is that both the journalism festival, its curators, and most journalists have now married Bluesky.

We have missed a very important train that will never pass again, therefore new tracks will have to be built to allow other trains to pass

@newsmast @giornalismo