get them this

wiki says:

On 26 June 2025, it was reported that the USAF had canceled the E-7 program due to ballooning costs and concerns about survivability. The termination, announced as part of the fiscal 2026 budget rollout, came after months of rumors that the program was in danger as the Trump administration increasingly set its sights on instead using space-based capabilities to help warplanes find and track enemy aircraft, known as the air moving target indicator (AMTI) mission.[7]

because E-3s are aging out, whatever little of E-2 that remain are to be supplemented by satellites. it’s definitely a take, and it also seems like awacs is important part of air war these days. not sure what they’re cooking

shitcanning your own awacs production (E-7) even when it’s needed for replacement of older ones will do that

they kinda do, it’s called forklift

so your solution to defeating a grenade is to dig explosive out of it?

While I have no evidence to support that claim I have seen someone putting live ammunition in a pot and making it cook off. That experiment clearly showed that cartridges are only really dangerous when used in a firearm. I expect the physics to be very much the same here.

then your expectations aren’t worth shit, because one is high explosive that does not require confinement to detonate, because reaction zone propagates through supersonic mechanical shock, and the other one is low explosive that has burn rate dependent on pressure, because it burns on surface, which forms foam, which slows down heat transfer, then foam collapses with pressure increase which makes heat transfer faster, but it’s all subsonic. some of the smallest fragments might be stopped by a pot wall, if grenade is in the center, but if it’s close to one wall, then the wall itself would just generate more fragments

but you probably won’t have pot on hand, or realize what is going on in time, and you don’t know how much time is left because of manufacturing tolerances, and you probably don’t have grenade sumps in your living room, so better way would be preventing this situation in the first place, for example using laminated windows or not being a probable mafia target in sweden, if it’s practical. not by trying to cover grenade with a pot, because you just spend more time closer to grenade this way

that would make the wall unsafe, i’m thinking more about the other ones. it’s not very typical to have cardboard wall, i’d like to make that point

but it’s even better to make sure that grenade doesn’t know where you are

I’d suggest having a “decorative” metal pot. If you could cover the grenade with it, that could potentially nullify its effect

this is just adding more metal to be thrown around

first, don’t be there, then don’t be detected, then don’t be hit

wall (brick or concrete, not cardboard) between you and grenade should stop fragments, anything less is heavily dependent on what kind of the thing it is and how lucky you are. ikea chair won’t save you, anything solid enough to be worth it would be so heavy that time spent moving it is just better spent moving away. if you live above ground floor, like on third floor or above, it’s likely that you’ll be fine because throwing grenades up is a really bad idea. grenades are round and roughly as heavy as rocks of similar size, perhaps you can get laminated glass windows that should crack but not let grenade through on impact

well otherwise they could just wait it out

most of that (7% of profits out of 12%) in stock vested over 2 years, so samsung got themselves a breather here. it might be also that these shares are at peak valuation now

It just might be that it’s cheaper than disruption

this trip is for my older brother to go pursue marriage plans… why the fuck would I tag along?

you’re designated wingman /s

turns out that normal people don’t want to be around places unmoderated and unmoderable by design, and instead it’s a magnet for nazis, pedos, nazi pedos and cryptobros, but i repeat myself

dragostea din tei blares in distance

nostr is packed with cryptobros, other scammers, and worse

it’s not a twenty year old paper, it’s a twenty two year old preprint which has all the reliability of a blog post. in 22 years, you can get born, complete all education bachelors degree, start masters degree and write a real paper that would be accepted in a real physics journal. the reason it’s not accepted for all these years is it is packed full of crackpot nonsense. it cites Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons ffs

you’re off by something like 15-18 orders of magnitude

op: lemmy is so intolerant against my views!

insert untitled goose with a knife chasing op: what views, fucker?

it’s not always like this, but it happens so often i’m not surprised