finnadrag

exactly the type of missing the point that I was talking about

And of course nuance is dead and if you’re not jerking off in the circlejerk you must support musk and everything he has ever done.

I just wish the musk circlejerk stayed in /c/enough_musk_spam. I’m not obsessed with him so I don’t care about his texas drainage permits any more than anyone else’s county drainage permits.

Good, hope it’s lonely. Die alone, bigot.

A lot of people get off on hating musk, they only really want an excuse at this point. Like the very upvoted comment ‘I don’t care if it’s outputting pure spring water’.

Nobody would care about this at all if it was any other company. ‘Company erodes county owned ditch without proper permit with water that would meet drinking water standards if you dilute it by half’. But people enjoy getting mad at musk so it gets clicks and upvotes. And of course this and every other comment that isn’t saying musk should be hanged for this will be downvoted because nuance is dead and if you’re not jerking off in the circlejerk you must support musk and everything he has ever done.

There is not so much of a shortage of real problems in the world that some permitting issue over a ditch in texas deserves global attention.

‘Your personal experience is invalid because it goes against the circlejerk’

Thacker Pass is inside the McDermitt Caldera, it’s the same deposit.

Really bizarre to write or post an article saying this deposit was ‘discovered’. This is decade old news. I saw the headline and thought ‘oh nice that’s like a whole other Thacker Pass’ but it literally is just Thacker Pass.

Somebody needs to figure out a way to prevent people from upvoting headlines of articles they haven’t read because as far as I can tell there is absolutely no reason to post or upvote this.

If only there was information in the post about where it is then you wouldn’t have to guess. Or you can just make stuff up to get mad at.

Ok technically it’s energy not power, big deal. Sometimes electricity is colloquially called power.

Rare to see someone so incapable of critical thought lmao

My logic sounds absurd when you apply it to a different example? why would you use a different example, that makes it sound dumb

it’s fine to eat because it’s food and it’s food because it’s fine to eat. simple as

The downvotes on this are both funny and telling. I like it so its good. Asking if its bad is bad.

I’m actually starting to see the point in a weird way. If they think about as critically as a dog or a cat maybe it doesn’t make sense to hold their decisions to a higher moral standard. We don’t call it immoral when non-human animals rape other non-human animals because they aren’t capable of the level of thought required to conceptualize moral decisions. But, uh, neither are significant amounts of humans apparently.

I can eat you therefore kiling and eating you is not morally wrong or a moral issue.

I really don’t understand how people can reconcile this kind of data with a positive opinion of humanity

40% of people saying ‘spanking children is not a moral issue’ is probably the worst datapoint here. At least 4 in 10 people are fully just animals blundering around operating on instinct and following what feels good. And that’s not even counting the other people whose idea of morality is just ‘what is my visceral reaction’ who had a visceral reaction.