• aldhissla@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Bold assumption that our descendants will have the kind of general education that would result in what we think of “extra homework” for “history students”. I imagine a future scholar to be like Kenneth from 30 Rock

    spoiler

    (in his mortal form)

    Kenneth saying: "Science was my most favourite subject. Especially the old testament."

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago
                  ODYSSEUS (V.O.)
      And for centuries of darkness to follow, 
      the stories of Troy will only be sung...
      
                    PENELOPE
      Why will the stories only be sung?
      
                    ODYSSEUS
      Because songs will be all they have to
      remember those of us who could write.
      
  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    All you young ones just wait until you get corrected in twenty years by someone like you because they didn’t live it and think they know more about it than you.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So… the US president was part of a child eating cult-like sex trafficking net that was actually managed by moSS*d. Countries around the world that stump into that information used it to blackmail him.

    At one point, the info got partially leaked, but he was kept in power for some reason.

    First: that wont ever make it to a history book

    Second: i wonder how many times things like this happened… this cabt be the first one

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      First: that wont ever make it to a history book

      It probably will, it’s too relevant to be left out. It will just not be explained in that plain language, because people care about protecting children from the raw character of historical figures.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    My high school US history class spent like two weeks on the revolutionary war, half a class on everything that happened up to the civil war, two or three weeks on the civil war, half a class on the rest of the 19th century, like a week on WWII, the roaring 20’s and dusbowl 30’s got a week, and the rest of the class was World War 2, the 4 years that made up 60% of our 250 year history.

    I have two hypotheses for why it was like that and they’re not mutually exclusive:

    1. WWII ends on a very boastful note for the USA. The defeat of not one but two objectively evil empires through both military and industrial might, that and having basically none of the fighting on our soil meant we came out of the war powerful and rich, eclipsing Great Britain as the superpower in the west. Almost immediately after that, history gets a lot less flattering.

    2. The boomers were in charge of setting the school curriculum circa 2002, and by their logic “Then World War 2 happened, and then I was born, and then stuff I personally remember happened, and because I personally remember it, it isn’t “history” therefore we don’t have to teach it. You learn about Upton Sinclair in history class, you learn about the Cuban Missile Crisis by watching the news, that’s just how it is.”

  • Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As if.

    They will water it down, shorten it up and place it at most on lesson on the side.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I might suggest that rather than saying people are dumb for having made certain decisions, that we should ask ourselves how the opinions that led to those decisions were formed. There are always external factors acting on and influencing our agency.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If history is taught correctly, they will know that Americans of today are propagandized to hell by the capitalist oligarchs who are fighting tooth and nail to maintain the hierarchy. That the coercive structure of the capitalist system left people alienated and disenfranchised and largely unable to overcome the sea of misinformation designed to isolate and divide communities.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s going to be Germany 1933-1945 all over again, except the leader is considered even more of a clown than the first time.

      • Secret_Music@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, the way the history books painted Hitler was like he was a supervillain with the power of convincing people to do what he wants against their will. Now I know that’s probably not true and that the Germans were probably just dumb as fuck pieces of shit that would’ve hammered their own faces if they were told to.

        • Signtist@bookwyr.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There were already plenty of examples to show that making people viscerally hate an arbitrary group of people is incredibly easy. The Stanford prison experiment is so well-known because it perfectly outlines our own innate desire to fit in, even when it means becoming evil, despite how much we want to convince ourselves that we’re above it.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’ll see how many primary sources even survive the following decades.

    Though I don’t envy anyone who has to do history science when a large amount of primary sources are available. Imagine having to analyse Trump tweets for a paper.

    • Tynan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We’re in the age of AI now. Are future historians going to be able to trust primary sources?

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I can see future students simply denying that anyone would have really voted for DJT.

      “I refuse to believe that anyone was that dumb!”

      Can’t really blame them, I can hardly believe it now.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Many Germans did vote for Hitler (never the absolute majority of voters, though), even though he was clearly hateful and evil and obviously making lots of false claims, and on top of that looked completely ridiculous when he was shouting and screaming in his speeches. Can’t remember seeing any German say that they don’t believe that anyone voted for the guy.

  • cmbabul@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s an outrageously optimistic hope of mine that there will be any students around to study history

  • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Guessing it will be called The Stupid Ages, or maybe The Antichrist Years, depending on who is in charge.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it’s like before, eventually it’ll be just a vague “things were bad” like the gilded age or great depression. Humans aren’t great at learning big picture things.