If you want me to come up with a reason why the person who receives millions more votes should become the representative then clearly you oppose democracy and idgaf about your opinion on anything.
Popular vote: HRC: 16,917,853 Bernie: 13,210,550
Percentage: 55.2%, 43.1%
Weāve been discussing how Bernie lost the popular vote this entire time. It was a brutal defeat where he was 2 digit percent margin. Even worse, in 2020 he lost to Joseph Biden when Biden literally doubled his vote.
Not sure how that is discouraging. Also, if all it takes is a New Zealander to make some ambiguous comment which then discourages people to not vote, you are all in far greater trouble than you know. On top of that, your pointless comment contributed nothing and was also incorrect. Well done. America is safe now.
Bro itās fucking exhausting how many progressive spaces refuse to admit that Bernie didnāt fucking get the votes to be the nominee. By like, a landslide.
I do think that in hindsight Clinton should have made him her VP choice though.
Where have people refused to admit that? My point was that the superdelegate system is unfair, because it gives the party favorite a huge advantage before anyone has even voted. Regardless of whether Iām for or against the party favorite, Iām against the superdelegate system.
The party insiders favored the person who has always been in the party, over someone who joined that year? Cmon man.
Bernie could have fixed this at any time, by actually joining the Democratic Party. He didnāt.
Bernie lost by MILLIONS of actual votes. Not super delegates. Actual votes.
Life aināt fair. Just because itās not fair, doesnāt mean people should sit at fucking home and sulk and not try and get something done instead of nothing.
I donāt care who the party insiders support, and itās completely understandable that they supported Hillary. But that shouldnāt translate to her having an enormous lead before anyone votes. Thatās not democratic. Considering the Democtratic party is named after democracy, youād think they should be a shining example of it.
I donāt know why you keep explaining that Bernie lost by millions of votes. I understand that. You are trying to convince me of something I already believe. I am simply trying to even explain to you that my problem is with what happened before anyone voted.
Based on what you just said though, I think you donāt fully understand how delegates work in the party. The superdelegates do matter. Letās say, based on voting, Bernie and Hillary had won the exact same number of delegates. Hillary would have won, because she had more delegates when you add the superdelegates. Now letās say, again based solely on voting, Bernie had won 300 more delegates than Hillary. Hillary would still have won, because she had ~360 superdelegates. Therefore, Bernie would have needed to get well over 50% of the vote to actually win. Thatās what we mean when we say the party screwed him.
The popular vote doesnāt really matter in the Democratic Party, because what determines who becomes the nominee is the delegate vote (similar to how Hillary won the popular vote but lost the electoral college, so didnāt win the election). Most delegates are required to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their state, but the superdelegates can vote for whoever they want. They absolutely can sway a primary to their preferred candidate. ~15% of delegates are superdelegates, which means that a candidate the party insiders donāt like may need to win 66% of the popular vote to win the candidacy. Thatās bad.
Yep! But that moral superiority sure must feel good when weāre all paying six fucking bucks for gas, and weāre an international embarrassment right?
If you want me to come up with a reason why the person who receives millions more votes should become the representative then clearly you oppose democracy and idgaf about your opinion on anything.
Being chosen by the people is what is fair.
Isnāt that the popular vote?..
Popular vote: HRC: 16,917,853 Bernie: 13,210,550
Percentage: 55.2%, 43.1%
Weāve been discussing how Bernie lost the popular vote this entire time. It was a brutal defeat where he was 2 digit percent margin. Even worse, in 2020 he lost to Joseph Biden when Biden literally doubled his vote.
Thanks. Not American so not very knowledgeable but appreciate the clarification.
Hello 7 day old account trying to discourage people from voting in the midterms!
Not sure how that is discouraging. Also, if all it takes is a New Zealander to make some ambiguous comment which then discourages people to not vote, you are all in far greater trouble than you know. On top of that, your pointless comment contributed nothing and was also incorrect. Well done. America is safe now.
There is a concerted effort to keep everyone in the dark about this, including Americans, so itās totally understandable.
Bro itās fucking exhausting how many progressive spaces refuse to admit that Bernie didnāt fucking get the votes to be the nominee. By like, a landslide.
I do think that in hindsight Clinton should have made him her VP choice though.
Where have people refused to admit that? My point was that the superdelegate system is unfair, because it gives the party favorite a huge advantage before anyone has even voted. Regardless of whether Iām for or against the party favorite, Iām against the superdelegate system.
The party insiders favored the person who has always been in the party, over someone who joined that year? Cmon man.
Bernie could have fixed this at any time, by actually joining the Democratic Party. He didnāt.
Bernie lost by MILLIONS of actual votes. Not super delegates. Actual votes.
Life aināt fair. Just because itās not fair, doesnāt mean people should sit at fucking home and sulk and not try and get something done instead of nothing.
I donāt care who the party insiders support, and itās completely understandable that they supported Hillary. But that shouldnāt translate to her having an enormous lead before anyone votes. Thatās not democratic. Considering the Democtratic party is named after democracy, youād think they should be a shining example of it.
I donāt know why you keep explaining that Bernie lost by millions of votes. I understand that. You are trying to convince me of something I already believe. I am simply trying to even explain to you that my problem is with what happened before anyone voted.
Based on what you just said though, I think you donāt fully understand how delegates work in the party. The superdelegates do matter. Letās say, based on voting, Bernie and Hillary had won the exact same number of delegates. Hillary would have won, because she had more delegates when you add the superdelegates. Now letās say, again based solely on voting, Bernie had won 300 more delegates than Hillary. Hillary would still have won, because she had ~360 superdelegates. Therefore, Bernie would have needed to get well over 50% of the vote to actually win. Thatās what we mean when we say the party screwed him.
The popular vote doesnāt really matter in the Democratic Party, because what determines who becomes the nominee is the delegate vote (similar to how Hillary won the popular vote but lost the electoral college, so didnāt win the election). Most delegates are required to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their state, but the superdelegates can vote for whoever they want. They absolutely can sway a primary to their preferred candidate. ~15% of delegates are superdelegates, which means that a candidate the party insiders donāt like may need to win 66% of the popular vote to win the candidacy. Thatās bad.
Yeah, that would have avoided the vast majority of everything that has happened since.
Yep! But that moral superiority sure must feel good when weāre all paying six fucking bucks for gas, and weāre an international embarrassment right?