I’ve been trying nushell and words fail me. It’s like it was made for actual humans to use! 🤯 🤯 🤯
It even repeats the column headers at the end of the table if the output takes more than your screen…
Trying to think of how to do the same thing with awk
/grep
/sort
/whatever
is giving me a headache. Actually just thinking about awk
is giving me a headache. I think I might be allergic.
I’m really curious, what’s your favorite shell? Have you tried other shells than your distro’s default one? Are you an awk wizard or do you run away very fast whenever it’s mentioned?
Fish is great.
Sorry I am vegan
Vegans can use fish, as long as they don’t bash
I used nushell for a good 6 months, it was nice having structured data, but the syntax difference to bash which I use for my day job was just too jarring to stick with.
Fish was (for me) the right balance of nice syntactic sugar and being able to reasonably expect a bash idiom will work.
That looks a lot like PowerShell
PowerShell without the awful syntax
What awful syntax?
Ffs bash uses
echo "${filename%.*}"
andsubstring=${string:0:5}
andlower="${var,,}"
andtitle="${var^}"
&c. It doesn’t usefor assignment, only in expressions.
I love Nushell, it’s so much more pleasant for writing scripts IMO. I know some people say they’d just use Python if they need more than what a POSIX shell offers, but I think Nushell is a perfect option in between.
With a Nushell scripts you get types, structured data, and useful commands for working with them, while still being able to easily execute and pipe external commands. I’ve only ever had two very minor gripes with Nushell, the inability to detach a process, and the lack of a
-l
flag forcp
. Now that uutils supports the-l
flag, Nushell support is a WIP, and I realized systemd-run is a better option than just detaching processes when SSHd into a server.I know another criticism is that it doesn’t work well with external cli tools, but I’ve honestly never had an issue with any. A ton of CLI tools support JSON output, which can be piped into
from json
to make working with it in Nushell very easy. Simpler tools often just output a basic table, which can be piped intodetect columns
to automatically turn it into a Nushell table. Sometimes strange formatting will make this a little weird, but fixing that formatting with some string manipulation (which Nushell also makes very easy) is usually still easier than trying to parse it in Bash.I’m an absolute Linux tard, so it’s hilarious to me trying to read and understand most of these comments
Everyone was a newbie at one point
I’m really curious, what’s your favorite shell?
Emacs eshell+eat
It essentially reverses the terminal/shell relationship. Here, it’s the shell that starts a terminal session for every command. Eshell is also tightly integrated with Emacs and has access to all the extended functionality. You can use Lisp in one-liners, you can pipe output directly to an emacs buffer, you can write custom commands as lisp functions, full shortcut customization not limited to terminal keys, history search via the completion framework (i.e. consult-history), easy prompt customization, etc.
There’s also Tramp, which lets you transparently
cd
into remote hosts via ssh, docker containers, SMB/NFS-shares, archive files, and work with them as if they were normal directories (obviously with limited functionality in some cases, like archives).And probably a lot of stuff I’m missing right now.
Until you discover nushell’s (lack of) quoting rules
Can you elaborate?
Last I checked, there was no rigorous system for how quoting worked, such as how to escape a quote inside a string.
I feel like if I was forced to use PowerShell I’d fall in love with it and want to use it on Linux. Passing objects between commands instead of text sounds amazing. So many (Linux) shell commands use slightly differently shaped text, it’s annoying. New line separated? Tab separated? Null separated? Comma separated? Multiple fields? JSON? And converting between them all and using different flags to accept different ones is just such a headache.
PowerShell’s
import-csv
andexport-csv
are too dang powerful. Doing batch processing in PS is so cool.I was under the impression that it was available on Linux?
It is, but I know myself and realistically unless I’m forced to learn it in an environment where it’s first class I’m not going to use it on a regular basis.
thanks, good thread.
I’ve used nushell for several months, and it really is an amazing shell
It feels more like an actual language than arcane runes, and I can easily makes chains and pipelines and things that would be difficult in bash
Additionally, it makes a pretty good scripting language
So you drive daily with nushell and then script in bash for portability?
Sounds not bad actually…
Formatting doesn’t like my input for some reason so I am just going to shorten it to
ls -ltc | grep '>'
.deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I’ve been using fish (with starship for prompt) for like a year I think, after having had a self-built zsh setup for … I don’t know how long.
I’m capable of using
awk
but in a very simple way; I generally prefer being able to usejq
. IMO both awk and perl are sort of remnants of the age before JSON became the standard text-based structured data format. We used to have to write a lot of dinky little regex-based parsers in Perl to extract data. These days we likely get JSON and can operate on actual data structures.I tried
nu
very briefly but I’m just too used to POSIX-ish shells to bother switching to another model. For scripting I’ll usewith
set -eou pipefail
but very quickly switch to Python if it looks like it’s going to have any sort of serious logic.My impression is that there’s likely more of us that’d like a less wibbly-wobbly, better shell language for scripting purposes, but that efforts into designing such a language very quickly goes in the direction of nu and oil and whatnot.
nu
's commands also work on JSON, so you don’t really need jq (or xq or yq) any more. It offers a unified set of commands that’ll work on almost any kind of structured data.That’s interesting I hadn’t thought about the JSON angle! Do you mean that you can actually use
jq
on regular command outputs likels -l
?Oil is an interesting project and the backward compatibility with bash is very neat! I don’t see myself using it though, since it’s syntax is very close to bash on purpose I’d probably get oil syntax and bash syntax all mixed up in my head and forget which is which… So I went with nushell because it doesn’t look anything like bash. If you know python what do you think about xonsh? I
That’s interesting I hadn’t thought about the JSON angle! Do you mean that you can actually use
jq
on regular command outputs likels -l
?No, you need to be using a tool which has json output as an option. These are becoming more common, but I think still rare among the GNU coreutils.
ls
output especially is unparseable, as in, there are tons of resources telling people not to do it because it’s pretty much guaranteed to break.There’s jc (CLI tool and python library that converts the output of popular command-line tools, file-types, and common strings to JSON, YAML, or Dictionaries).
You’ve opened a rabbit hole I know I’m just going to fall down… thanks netizen!