• r0ertel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good question. I’d say based on speed and risk. If they go as fast as a walking person and won’t bump people, upset the flow or get in the way, sidewalk is OK (to a limit, you can’t have hundreds of these things zooming all over.) If they are slow and on the street or bike lane, they’re likely to cause problems. I’ve heard some people say that companies need to pay to widen the sidewalk to accommodate these things, but that’s a whole different problem

      • black0ut@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sidewalks are for people. Allowing corporations to use infrastructure that was built for people, using the people’s money, to turn a profit is bad.

        This woman is fighting the good fight, and I wish her the best of luck.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Definitely not. Look at the short video in the article, and imagine there are dozens of those things, which will inevitably happen if this kind of thing ramps up, which is surely what the corporation who’s running these things wants. There would be no way to safely walk down the sidewalk, and people would be forced to walk in the street to get around them.

        • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, fuck those people with movement disorders and their spinal and neurological disabilities, they should get back in the hospital bed where they belong. /s

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be fair if there are dozens of these things on the sidewalk then that means traffic is much better and the road can be cannibalized to increase the area available. Assuming the government acts fairly and promptly (hah, as if), this is a win for everyone involved.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          if there are dozens of these things on the sidewalk then that means traffic is much better

          That’s a stretch. There could still be plenty of car traffic while still having sidewalks filled with bots

          • madkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m guessing because one of these means a 5-8 passenger internal combustion vehicle is not on the roads, but we all know pedestrians will never get that real estate back.

        • swicano@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 days ago

          The road! It’s got 4 wheels and motors. Or we could think about how we’ve designed urban spaces that surrender all space to cars forcing everyone not in a car can get fucked, so maybe take one car lane away and make a new bike/ delivery bot lane.

            • swicano@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well unluckily we don’t have any special exceptions for people with disabilities, so this means I’m forced to double down and say wheelchair users also belong on the road, IF their wheelchair is electrified.

              My argument is still that more space should be taken from driving and parking lanes rather than turning pedestrian areas into the dumping ground for anything that’s not a car, overcrowding it.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Except they’re not road fit.

            They can’t go at appropriate speeds (IIRC most of these go at best 10mph)

            They’re small and low - visibility within city level follow distance is impossible

            Overall, everyone’s safer if they stay on the pavement.

            • swicano@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not sure I see your point, unless you’re assuming college campuses and downtown cores aren’t still heavily car based in the US? I assure you most of them have a road or parking lane to spare near the restaurants that the bots want to pick up from

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Honestly, have them share a bus lane, or expand bike lanes into a secondary lane for delivery robots. Make it on the outside though, so there’s a buffer for cyclists.

            • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              I already hate sharing a sidewalk with them, I would shit blood if one of these fuckers made me late for a bus transfer because it was doing something stupid in the shared lane.