SGGeorwell@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 months agoWe don’t have room in the carbon budget for a world war.message-squaremessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up1283
arrow-up1283message-squareWe don’t have room in the carbon budget for a world war.SGGeorwell@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square98linkfedilink
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·3 months agoReducing population goes a long way towards helping though. It all depends on just how apocalyptic the world war is
minus-squareshawn1122@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-23 months agoPresumably the impact would be greatest if the population in areas with highest per capita usage were reduced first, right?
minus-squarebryndos@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoYou’d probably need to put the oil out of reach of the survivors.
minus-squareSoulphite@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoEh, a few old demented psychopaths armed with nuclear warheads? I’d wager to say pretty apocalyptic.
minus-squareRestaldt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoBethesda this IS NOT what I wanted for Fallout 5
Reducing population goes a long way towards helping though. It all depends on just how apocalyptic the world war is
Presumably the impact would be greatest if the population in areas with highest per capita usage were reduced first, right?
You’d probably need to put the oil out of reach of the survivors.
Eh, a few old demented psychopaths armed with nuclear warheads? I’d wager to say pretty apocalyptic.
Bethesda this IS NOT what I wanted for Fallout 5