• muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      You don’t want barriers for scammers because they inconvenience real customers. So you choose to enable the scammers. That is exactly why this works.

      Thanks for playing.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree. What do you suggest? Just shut it down?

        I guess I could move to SantaFe and do something with turquoise.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          People have already given you options and you repeatedly say “nah, that’s inconvenient”. The inconvenience is the point. You are inconveniencing customers who want to get a thing from you and have a reason to endure it to achieve that goal but you are also inconveniencing the scammers who have no goal at the end so…

          Fuck it. Have fun in Santa Fe. Save me a seat and some tequila.

          • Steve@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I feel like the card processors should bear this responsibility. I dont have the technical skill to apply most of the suggestions, and I fear damaging my income by doing it wrong.

            • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              They should, yes, but they don’t. In fact, they’ll ding you for having too many failed transactions and claim that it’s your responsibility to do something about it.