I mean if a holy item suddenly starts growing human cardiac tissue, its a miracle
and it was tested, and its human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive, meaning its not from.a cadaver
and if testing things isnt science, what is?
science by definition is using the scientific method to prove or disprove something
It has not been shown that a host grew tissue, it has been shown that somebody had a sample of human tissue.
You may not have seen my added second paragraph (apologies for editing that in): even if a host grew human tissue, that’s highly unusual but not proof of a deity.
No. If you can prove that’s what happened, you’ve proven that it has happened. You haven’t shown that it was caused by a deity. The fact that humans have proclaimed this object to be “the Body of Christ” is not proof.
I honestly don’t know what could make me believe in a claim as extraordinary as “the god as described by the Christian Bible (or any other religion’s scripture) exists” but from all I know about this supposed entity, this god would know what would convince me and would have no issue making it absolutely obvious and inevitable to me.
Parlour tricks like having blood grow on hosts is not it.
“Someone brought a sample of something” is not science.
I mean if a holy item suddenly starts growing human cardiac tissue, its a miracle and it was tested, and its human cardiac tissue with the WBCs still alive, meaning its not from.a cadaver
and if testing things isnt science, what is? science by definition is using the scientific method to prove or disprove something
It hasn’t been shown that that’s what happened though. What has been shown is that someone had a sample of something.
And even if a thing grew human tissue, that’s proof of that thing growing human tissue. It takes a LOT more to prove a deity exists.
the host grew ALIVE HUMAN Cardiac Tissue
that is literallly scientifically impossible unless…
It has not been shown that a host grew tissue, it has been shown that somebody had a sample of human tissue.
You may not have seen my added second paragraph (apologies for editing that in): even if a host grew human tissue, that’s highly unusual but not proof of a deity.
Yes, a holy item proclaimed to the be the Body of Christ grows living heart tissue and its not enough proof?
No. If you can prove that’s what happened, you’ve proven that it has happened. You haven’t shown that it was caused by a deity. The fact that humans have proclaimed this object to be “the Body of Christ” is not proof.
what proof do you need?
I honestly don’t know what could make me believe in a claim as extraordinary as “the god as described by the Christian Bible (or any other religion’s scripture) exists” but from all I know about this supposed entity, this god would know what would convince me and would have no issue making it absolutely obvious and inevitable to me.
Parlour tricks like having blood grow on hosts is not it.
it is, they had an entire professional camera team brought in
A “camera team” is not science.
the same host that was photographed was brought in…
You don’t know that and it hasn’t been shown.