- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- fediverse@lemmy.ml
130
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- fediverse@lemmy.ml
:pona_plush: #FediPact :pona_plush: (@FediPact@cyberpunk.lol)
cyberpunk.lol# INSTANCES KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN SCRAPED BY META INCLUDE:
ā¢ mastodon.social
ā¢ mastodon.online
ā¢ tech.lgbt
ā¢ hackers.town
ā¢ chaos.social
ā¢ mastodon.org.uk
ā¢ mastodont.cat
ā¢ mastodon.de
ā¢ mastodon.xyz
ā¢ mastodon.coffee
ā¢ mastodon.cloud
ā¢ mastodon.scot
ā¢ mastodonapp.uk
ā¢ mastodon.green
ā¢ mastodon.ml
ā¢ mastodon.au
ā¢ mastodon.eus
ā¢ mastodonczech.cz
ā¢ mastodon.sdf.org
ā¢ mstdn.social
ā¢ troet.cafe
ā¢ techhub.social
ā¢ tchncs.de
ā¢ kolektiva.social
ā¢ mamot.fr
ā¢ defcon.social
ā¢ meow.social
ā¢ social.linux.pizza
ā¢ ioc.exchange
ā¢ eldritch.cafe
ā¢ yiff.life
ā¢ furry.engineer
ā¢ infosec.exchange
ā¢ blahaj.zone
ā¢ woof.group
ā¢ union.place
ā¢ queer.party
ā¢ sakurajima.moe
ā¢ pawb.social
ā¢ digipres.club
ā¢ journa.host
ā¢ corteximplant.net
ā¢ corteximplant.com
ā¢ octodon.social
ā¢ bitbang.social
ā¢ jorts.horse
ā¢ tenforward.social
ā¢ pnw.zone
ā¢ spore.social
ā¢ hear-me.social
ā¢ neuromatch.social
ā¢ vt.social
ā¢ cosocial.ca
ā¢ chitter.xyz
ā¢ tooter.social
ā¢ cloudisland.nz
ā¢ social.seattle.wa.us
ā¢ masto.es
ā¢ nobigtech.es
ā¢ mastodon.gal
ā¢ masto.host
ā¢ toot.community
ā¢ pony.social
ā¢ climatejustice.global
ā¢ pleroma.envs.net
ā¢ indiepocalypse.social
ā¢ anarchism.space
ā¢ disroot.org
ā¢ dragonscave.space
ā¢ toot.bike
ā¢ fuzzies.wtf
ā¢ norden.social
ā¢ beige.party
ā¢ ohai.social
ā¢ freeradical.zone
ā¢ metalhead.club
ā¢ treehouse.systems
ā¢ icosahedron.website
ā¢ sunbeam.city
ā¢ sunny.garden
ā¢ zeroes.ca
ā¢ ursal.zone
ā¢ chaosfem.tw
ā¢ mas.to
ā¢ mathstodon.xyz
ā¢ rubber.social
ā¢ todon.nl
ā¢ cupoftea.social
ā¢ nerdculture.de
ā¢ toad.social
there're definitely more, i just did ctrl+f when i thought of an instance name so i definitely missed some. will be editing this list to add them as i think of them
#FediPact #meta #threads
This is only a loosely related thought, but are there any new foss licenses or anything that prohibit ai usage? I know itāll be ignored but it feels like explicitly disallowing things could be important in opening the door to successful legal challenges to ai scraping and theftā¦
Case law is still pretty young in this area, but itās looking like thereās nothing actually against copyright about the training of AI on copyrighted content. Itās not something that a license can restrict because the trainers can simply reject the license and carry on training under the basics of what the law allows them to do anyway.
Open source licenses only have power because they grant permissions that people normally wouldnāt have and put conditions on those permissions. If you donāt need those permissions then you donāt have to be bound by those conditions.
Ahhh, that sucks ass :(
Thank you for expanding my understanding of the problem!