• Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The US environment, systems, and societies are not conducive to HSR. You will see widespread cheap electric flights before you see HSR. Here’s a good video explaining why: https://youtu.be/753xlF0EWsI

    Basically the land costs way more, it’s viewed as business that needs to profit, not infrastructure you spend on, and you cant bulldoze over people as cheaply to make the necessary routes.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I hope so. It seems I came across as anti-HSR in my comment. But I would very much like to see investment in HSR in the US. I was more acknowledging the barriers are different there than compared to places like China.

        Do you have a good reference I can check out on why tge barriers mentioned in the video aren’t as big as it makes out?

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Public transport doesn’t need to turn a profit. Once that’s fully understood, the rest makes far more sense

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Yes. The comment was about explaining the under acknowledged problems/barriers to overcome, onea, that are smaller problems in China. It was not an argument against HSR, but a prediction on how political will in the US is more likely to be placed behind different infrastructure solutions than HSR. I think HSR is great and would love to see it in the US.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Legal (anti-rail legislation both regarding constructing and operating it) and political (lack of funding and open political opposition).